RE:RE:RE:3 Questions For DynaCert That Need Answers!
yesimakeit wrote: I'm sure more than a few investors in DynaCert have done this over the years.
I am not interested in the company schpeel for callers. I am interested in real answers that could be published here or elsewhere. Answers that can be put in front of eyes that are qualified to judge and evaluate them.
Answers that cannot only be "forward statements". Answers that are either facts or BS!
You are not alone. One should be highly suspicious of any company that touts a "black-box" technology based on spurious claims based on singular performance tests - but with no substantial field data or user testimonials. There are many more suspicions raised over DYA's reporting, than there are credible, defensible demonstrations of the product's capabilities. I have been researching this for more than half a year, and cannot find a single commercial trucking company that has posted a positive testimonial as to the performance and/or reliability of this product - and from the other posts on this site - this is after more than 10 years of their being in business ? Something here does not pass "the smell test."
It reminds me of Theranos. That debacle lasted for 13 years - before the cat got out of the back that their "black-box" technology was a complete scam - but not before investors were duped out of literally BILLIONS of dollars.
Fools and their money quickly go their separate ways - particularly when encourages by charlatants bent on separating people from their money. Speculating and Investing - are not the same thing. Read this article - and consider yourselves warned.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theranos