Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Spectral Medical Inc T.EDT

Alternate Symbol(s):  EDTXF

Spectral develops devices for unmet medical needs. Sepsis occurs in 1.7M Americans/year causing 250K deaths, often caused by endotoxin. Our devices measure and remove endotoxin from the bloodstream. An FDA confirmatory trial is underway. Dialco, a Spectral sub, offers SAMI, a novel instrument for renal replacement, cleared by FDA. Dialco is seeking FDA approval for DIMI a unique home dialysis enabler. These devices have large commercial potential


TSX:EDT - Post by User

Post by hmmmmmmmmon Oct 16, 2022 7:03pm
304 Views
Post# 35028031

Is it legal?

Is it legal?

Is it legal for Spectral to withhold the name of a “confirmed clinical partner” who will be in charge of up to 85% of the DIMI trial- while placing options at a measly .40 cents?

 

What if that “confirmed clinical partner” turns out to be a giant dialysis company, and when that “material information” is disclosed it dramatically increases the share price? 

 

Would it have been legal for Spectral to hold back that material information for 4 months and during that time place millions of underpriced shares?

 

This would obviously have a dramatic effect on the level of dilution, and would clearly raise suspicions of insider dealings.

 

I’m asking both investors here, and a securities attorney. 

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>