RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Michigan IdiotBack to my original reply to you. You are comfortable with taking freedoms, but not with freedoms being taken from you. Both (arguably) involve killing: abortion and willfully assisting the spread of a deadly virus.
That's the problem for me, is that you countenance some killing and decry other killing. Both these types of killings are willful acts. You would (without feeling guilt, I presume) kill a member of your family by not following good anti-viral measures, but you'd stop a stranger from getting an abortion. Why is one death okay but not the other?
And if you didn't want this discussed, you'd not have mentioned being pro-life. You wear it in public like a badge, just like that other badge (will-kill-by-virus-if-allowed).
.
Piraal wrote: TickerTwit wrote: Not viable, therefore not alive.
.
Piraal wrote: Killing human life is murder in my opnion, and as I already said I am aloud to have an opnion that difers from your. Take your own advice, calm down and mind your buisness.
Guess what, you are entitled to that opinion. Not sure why this extremely predictable agrument is still being dragged out. I don't care what your opnion is, you are clearly trying to argue about this, and I can't stress this enough.... I have no interest in arguing with you. If I could go back in time and not try to be fair and give an example that criticizes the party that advocates for the single issue vote that I care about(well doing nothing they promise) then I would because this whole interaction is absolutely pointless. I have no interest in changing your mind, and I have no interest in hearing you parrot the same arguments I have heard from other over aggrssive keyboard warriors.