Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Euro Sun Mining Inc T.ESM

Alternate Symbol(s):  CPNFF

Euro Sun Mining Inc. is a Canada-based mining company focused on exploration of gold and copper. The Company is focused primarily on its 100% owned Rovina Valley Project (RVP) located in west-central Romania. The Company operates through the development of its Romanian mining permit segment. The Rovina Valley Project consists of three copper-gold porphyry systems, such as Rovina, Colnic and Ciresata. The Company’s wholly owned subsidiaries include SAMAX Romania Limited and SAMAX Romania S.R.L.


TSX:ESM - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by kynarron Feb 20, 2019 2:29pm
94 Views
Post# 29389494

RE:RE:Now what?

RE:RE:Now what?

@grape562000

Along with that, Pretium is valued at nearly 2B, with lower total resources, and higher AISC.

The one concern I have, and something we'll need to include in future communications with mgmt (lookingat you Peter), is why release a PEA in this manner.

Mgmt had 3 options:

1) A PEA JUST for the first mine, with the smallest possible CAPEX, in order to get attractive jumbers including NPV, iRR and AISC, with which we could eventually fund the other mines thanks to high net profits.

2) A PEA with a high ~500M+ CAPEX funding 40k tons per day operations, akin to the 2010 PEA, effectively funding all 3 mines all at once.

3) A PEA funding most of the infrastructure expenditure for all 3 mines, at a lower CAPEX of ~330M, but using only one mine for the first few years of the project.

 

I wonder why mgmt thought #3 was the right option. #1 and #2, in my opinion, provide much more attractive numbers.

Bullboard Posts