Re iiioiiiAs you're probably aware, it's customary for companies to give at least a brief overview of what a central figure to the company will be doing and / or focussing on. Subsequent to being added or removed from the board of directors There was a gross omission of details regarding that in the related NR. It's plain for anyone to see and for a prior investor ( and to be questioned as one is humorous to me ) and person currently watching Exro it really stood out to me. I don't think any xro investor is actually satisfied with the AGM news release, and only the most defensive share holder would try and justify the incomplete update.
It was a poor update and by it's very nature opens up the converstation to conjecture of anyone looking at the situation objectively. Until clarification comes then the possiblities of negative developments remain open to rational trains of thought. This type of conversation should be welcomed by any investment community that values transparency and truth to serve at the core of it's convictions
Yes, I have brought up HRH in two boards. This one and DYA. My reasoning being that like minded investors would be interested in the unique opportunity that exists there. I'm sure that there are others on the board that were appreciative of the heads up. Truth be told the majority of my HRH position was purchased at current market value, and I certainly have no intention of selling any shares even close to what they are priced at now. I shared out of a genuine belief that others could benefit. If you're a stickler for rules, then sure I was in the wrong. If however you're interested in a certain level of open discussion on this stock forum. Which allows for the occasional exchange of ideas when it comes from an honest source with similar investment interests, then a genuine tip should perhaps not be frowned upon so quickly.