RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:to the naysayers and whinersThe difference between Exro's numbers and Heats numbers are real world third party testing This cannot be overstated. Exro has had test vehicles on the road and their claims are real world numbers, not theoretical, projected or hypothetical. The whole EV world right now is chasing efficiencies in the Traction Inverter Market, I get it. but when investing one must pick the most sound company with the best management the most proof the best advantages, the one where Indistey is flocking too in spades, the one who has ties the most reputable companies and on and on. Mitigate risks so to speak on what some consider highly speculative stocks. When you compare Exro to Heat, as many posters here are doing due to the relationship Ari once had with Exro, one must analyze critically, not emotionally. When you do, the only comparison is the word "traction inverter". If heat has anything sound they are at the very least 2-3 years behind Exro and in an all or nothing game that's a long way... never mind the overall strength and benefit one has over the other. No car maker is going to pick heat over Exro at this stage in their development, and that is what investors need to consider, so go ahead invest in Heat all you like, it's Exro for me!! Exro is not going to buy heat as it will take them another three years to test the integration of the tech and the world is moving too fast for that at the moment! Heat does not have anything Exro needs, if they did Exromwould have put 5m in like they did with SEA... so no need to pump heat on these boards.