Shadestone/Patientrisky investorBoulder field was almost 5km North/South. 900 meters East/West.
PLS at present is 2.24 km X 200(or so) meters NE/SW.
As I stated some of the drill results were spectacular (over 40-50% that Shad. alluded to)
Point: Even allowing for ice angle, it seems that since the boulders only travelled a short distance,there must be other shear areas yet to be found to account for the full length of the boulder field.
The two highest % holes may well be related to the high % boulders, but unknown is; is it the main core...if a core even exists? FCU has not stated that. High probability that more is still to come! Remember these are the early days of exploration.
Pati: As for Cluff Lake, it came on line in 1980. The 16,000 ounces are ONLY for 1987 and beyond. That is the only record you will find.
Cluff operated for 7 years before that (Cogema/Areva) and took out the main core high grade ore during that time. One cannot find any record of the gold/Uranium/Silver produced during those 7 years. If anyone finds anything relating to the time previous to 1987, kindly let me know!
Having personally done analysis on the Cluff Lake exploration cores in conjunction with at least 6 other Analytical Chemists, we all saw and tested the extremely rich core samples from 1974 on. We had to take special precautions due to high radiation. 100 ounces per ton gold was almost considered low while at least one sample ran over 600 ounces per ton gold and over 1500 ounces per ton silver and U3O8 close to 80%.
They easily took out 5 times the amount of gold you stated in the 1st 1,000 tons of operation.
You can believe what you want but I know what I saw and tested.
Incidentally there is another Uranium/gold discovery in one of the North Scandinavian countries that is very similar to Cluff in high U and Au.
Solver