RE:Responding to my detractorsquakes!!
Don't get mad and leave! I don't always agree with you and I sometimes question your seemingly one sided analysis but I always read your thought provoking and many times very informative posts. I think most on the board do appreciate your comments as evidenced by your high star ratings on your posts. It is a very frustrating time for all of us shareholders, so many of us are prone to criticize more than usual. Your objections to this deal have be noted. The information you always provide and the discussions from that are appreciated. So get back in here! And so what if we give you a shot once in a while, water off a duck's back!
quakes99 wrote: If I'm being paid then I guess Dev is going to want his money back. ;-0
I've done valuation exercises showing that the merger offer is too low and encouraged FCU investors to demand the Share Exchange Ratio be raised from 1.26 to 1.50.
You know that you must be getting close to the truth when you try to post informative information to enlighten others on the legal, financial, and side issues relating to the merger and get attacked at every turn by the exact same group of traders... over and over again. Why are they so afraid of the information I post?
Take the
Fission Uranium Reference Library for example. It now contains over 140 links to documents, websites, analyst reports, company data, mining and geology instructional materials, videos, webcasts, a vast corucopia of investment-related data to do with the Uranium exploration and mining industry as well as Nuclear Energy and its growing place in the world.
My
Guide to the Triple R Uranium Deposit in Canada's Athabasca Basin is as relevant today as ever, possibly even more relevant to those considering entering at these discount prices. The underlying fundamental story that Ross McElroy has been constructing still remains, as Dev said in his blog, "what I consider without a doubt to be world’s best undeveloped uranium asset."
I thought investors would appreciate a set of links to information in the public domain that might help them become better investors.
I didn't ask Dev to enter into a Merger agreement with Denison Mines. It's the last thing in the the world I wanted or was expecting.
But investors still deserve to be provided with analysis and substantiated opinion from various sides of the issues today. That's why I try to show them from different perspectives, rather than like the bashers who just say "run for the exits", where they are standing ready to take your shares as you leave.
Yes, the bathwater is looking pretty dirty now and in need of dumping... but do we really need to throw our Triple R baby out at the same time? It's still the best in the world, bar none!
If you really aren't interested in my analyses and perspectives then fine... I'll just keep them to myself and wish you all the luck in the world!
Cheers and good luck with your due diligence!