RE:RE:RE:Points to ponder in an objective merger debate...bull_man .... exactly right
bull_man wrote: CanadianBuck, i like your passion buddy....."this is a krap deal with a krap company".....well said; we didn't need this ridiculous merger deal to protect us from a hostile takeover attempt; as you say, we could have handled this on our own by voting NO to a low ball bid; also, dev could have just advised shareholders as to what he thought of a low bid, as was done by HAT management when they thought the original offers were too low for the roughrider deposit; there seems to be a hidden agenda here that unfortunately, we are not privy to; let's hope i'm/we are wrong.