RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:NEWS: Fission Uranium Corp. Provides Update to Shareholdersbad blood between board member is not a bad thing - they can hold each other accountable that way. And if they don't want to be professional and quit - they can leave with their options paid out at this horrendous share price (poetic justice given their shenanigans caused the share price to tank). And I would bet that Ross would not leave - he is not a fool - any further association with Dev in this mutiny Quakes describes would be career suicide.
mesa1 wrote: My bet is that any director nominees put forward by the dissention effort will be associated or linked to certain individuals that have been very involved in the past, and/or behind the scenes large shareholders, of at least two uranium plays ...
Hathor and NexGen.
Can anyone pull up all the common players and/or investors?
Bonus question ...
Any of them have a history of bad blood with Dev.
Just trying to connect the dots. I do not have any proof or special knowledge, other than some digging around, asking pointed questions, and getting some opinions on the street from those with historic knowledge.
giz62 wrote: Greenday wrote "
Jim doesn't have the type of experience that's required for holding a seat on Fission's Board of Directors" Jim as made it clear he has no intention for putting his name forward...what he has promised are candidates of the highest quality, I will judge based on their merit.
Gifford told the Investing News Network that he has “no designs on a board of directors seat.”
He added that FCU OverSight will be bringing adequate director nominees before the advance-notice deadline, and said that he has “always known that only the highest-quality board of director nominees will stand the scrutiny of retail and institutional shareholders.”