RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:FIRE or WATER ? Toorealistic.... may i ask if your relative with Toohip?
Toorealistic5 wrote:
finally, some common sense. It's hilarious that people think just because bmo was the underwriter of the last bought deal it means they purchased into the bought deal as well. Anyone who says this knows absolutely nothing to begin with. Secondly its on sedar that MMCap purchased 75 out of the 100 mill from that bought deal. Also, revenue increase doesn't mean anything when you have a load of debt. Fyi if you look at the financials the debentures are under debt. At 6% they are paying 6mill every year for that bought deal. Imagine going to a bank and saying I made 4 mill then 10mill and will be making 19mill but I'm 100mill in debt, can you give me a loan? There's a common pattern with people that support this company to no end. They refuse to believe any negative comments about it even though they are true and resort to childish insults. Then again, if they didn't act like that then maybe they could actually have the capacity to do research and not be invested in this company