RE:RE:Bashers/Pumpers/SupremeI wasn't calling you a basher, Brent. Was simply stating how you and Tommy were both saying the same thing but one came off level headed like they've learned from it and another letting anger control his emotions. It was just an assumption as you were gone for years from this website and are now back. I meant no harm by my comment and I apologize for assuming. You know what they say about assumptions, afterall. To get a message, any message across the wording has to be right to protect sensitive people from overreacting. Supreme has always been good with their words and that's the biggest issue here. Keep investors in the dark, switch CEOs constantly and have them sell their shares and take no blame. People say the one guy will always be better than the last but clearly not the case. Supreme has long missed it's train. The people holding now would've been better off investing in big players in other sectors than this one. More legitimate sectors, I won't make company not to cause a riot. Holding something for over 3 years though and not taking profits is a ridiculous idea. Hoping that a stock will only move up. Anyways, wasn't bashing you, more in agreement with you. Once again apologies for the assumptions.