Supreme Cannabis Company Inc. (The) T.FIRE

Another day in the life of a fire shareholder

[Bever73]

Bleeding a slow death ; no news ; nothing going on ; pot market passing company by as there anti promotion policy repels capital

[Texas118]

Bever. You are IGNORED. Your cup is always HALF EMPTY.  Your post history is always derogatory and you preach nothing but doom and gloom. You do not contribute anything worth my time. 

[Bever73]

Truth hurts...sad thing is i likely have more shares than all.you pumpers combined.....(too stubborn to take a loss at this point) Wakeup call needed; mgmt has to leave there anti publicity and promotion policies to themselves. This is a public company ; promotion generates capital...end of story FAR TO COMPLACENT

[maritimedreamer]

I call BS....... if you apparently have more shares then all the 'pumpers combined' why would you be so negative towards this company? So you state that you are too stubborn to sell but all you do is rip this company apart...... if you were as heavily invested as you are do your really think the disruption of the management will fix something? because that will exude confidence more then

[NukeLaLoosh1]

Ed, cleaver beaver and others are obvious in their intentions. But I’m an invested shareholder and think that the management of this company is turning into a sick joke.   Its wonderful that our ceo is now vice chair of some think tank advocacy group.  But that means nothing.  Look at what Vic Neufeld is doing at APH and do that.  He’s hiring true big shots not 30 something’s

[maritimedreamer]

i guess that is where you will have to make your decision...... I think Fowler is a new type of leader that actually understands the plant and his strategy. He is being strategic with grwoth as Fire is fundamentally a company based on rec not med. It is for you to believe if management and team are capable of running a company. But let me ask you one thing.... what experience did the CEOs of Weed

[JRSDIRECT]

What I kike about Mr.Fowler is is repeated statement from himself (and other's have quoted) is that is he passionate about the product, the market, and the evolution of MJ globally. He's a demostrates himself to be a put-up or shut-up type guy. Changed his career path and built this company from the ground up. Some business owners may be successful because they are passionate about '

[NukeLaLoosh1]

I personally did not invest in this company because our ceo is passionate about the sector or seen as some kind of advocate.   Success isnt measured in passion, it’s messured in results.   So far we have very few tangible ones that have resulted in this business as being regarded amongst those quoted in another post.  ACB, Weed and others may well have started out with people

[JRSDIRECT]

A recreational MJ B2B company selling to the recreational market is not making any money prior to legalization. Wow, what a surprise. Every company will have their position in the market. If you prefer ACB and WEED then I suggest your invest there.  Let's talk 6 months post legalization. I could be wrong, could be right... We'll see. GLTA

[maritimedreamer]

agreed..... many of these companies have been trying to balance the aquisition of clients in the medical realm as well as ramp up for rec. Supreme doesn't care who buys their product as a B2B wholesaler they will supply to anyone that is in need. Those that understand Supreme's model should of expected Supreme to not be out of the gate first.... their model is based on REC... this is why

[JRSDIRECT]

My friend, your summary is completely on point. Maybe others investors don't do their proper DD when purchasing a stock 'Oh the company is callled something-something cannbis,  I'll buy that' Ah well. Another day.

[maritimedreamer]

but they will have 1 million square feet so that must mean they are better!!!!!! Wait until people actually start talking about yield per sq ft....... or what strains they are growing and quality....what happens with these huge open facilities if they have an infestation or pest probelm? Supreme's idea of compartmentalization is genious imo...... an ability to reduce risk by having seperate

[Bever73]

Yea exactly.... Proof is in the ultimate score card the equity price No support ; chronically undervalued compared to peers....WHY??? because the market does not "understand" ...wrong... Time for someone new to takeover ...leave the passionate , and educated to go teach at the local university Time for results. quote=NukeLaLoosh1]I personally did not invest in this company because our

[JRSDIRECT]

My goodness, apparently everyone nows more about how to run the company than the CEO and Founder of the company. Huh, do you know what he is literally doing right now? Running his company, while you what? Sit here bashing away on this stupid MB  but apparently everybody knows more. Love the 'Monday-moring quarterbacks', just classic.

[Tomharley]

Haha nice write up!

[OptGreen]

Hard to figure here Bev, not sure if you are just one of the cupcakes, the weak and needy or you truly don't understand....the "Proof" you refer to is complete bullshite....Currently Supreme has no peers, so you have no comparable in the sector and they are not under valued....the current SP reflects ~10% of the value of the company because ~10% of the assets/ provables are

[Fastlane2]

Best discussion in awhile. I'm a long time shareholder and questioned the direction and approach John serves it's shareholders many times. The lack of promotion and news of Supreme's progress is alarming. The thought process of Supreme's product will speak for itself comes from the perception of a CEO who thinks his sh"t doesn't stink. The B2B model is very interesting but

[OptGreen]

Agreed Fast, I have had my concerns along the way and would not hesitate to sell if the negatives out weigh the positives and on one hand would like to see/ hear more material news, of course, but on the other side a blizzard of useless bullshite bothers me more....there is promotion done all the time with customers which has generated a fairly substantial amount of signed agreements to date

[MaddogNick]

You said ,The B2B model is very interesting but the share price speaks for itself. ACB is doing the B2B model as well. The shareholders know its hard to compete against a monster , aggressive company like ACB. Fires John sucks, people I use to have huge shares in fire but John is a joke.

[solarcradle]

Have a look at other heavily diluted companies and how long it took them to remove 200-300m+ outstanding shares of dilution, and where they stand today. It wasn't that long ago. :)  Also, Supreme was always 'x" months behind companies such as ACB, in terms of financing and dilution removal. That's a good place for Supreme to be in, IMO. It's not a competition based on

[solarcradle]

I'm hoping Supreme spends the money on news and IR when Supreme is ready to hit the TSX, and when rec is legalized. Would be nice to see Supreme uplist to the TSX with assertive but humble numbers on the books. :). It's a very possible scenario, IMO.  Big rec moves are next for companies. Should be interesting to see the partnerships and acquisitions take places. I am content

[Fastlane2]

The reason most of us are here is because we understand the base fundamentals and truly believe in John's vision, I would, like most would like to see more informative news releases (not fluff) on the build out, more details about how the LOI are working only to mention a few. The details will be in the upcoming quarterly release, looking forward to reading it. Long FIRE.

[Bever73]

Fastlane all the info you are looking for is on the companies website in there corporate presentation. Its pretty sharp and they update it every once in a while...clearly outlines the companies vision / goals/ timeline etc; prob took them a few days to get it up but it certainly is good info for those wondering about fire .... Check it out here: https://www.sunniva.com/investors/ Quote=Fastlane2

[theTransporter]

Budweiser is a monster as well but there's many other brands including craft brands doing extremely well despite that so your argument on "hard to compete against a monster" is flawed.  There's plenty of customers for everyone as demand exceeds supply in the rec market when it launches. 

[Tomharley]

You can not compare this to Budweiser. That's ridiculous. That is an established brand of beer for many years. This is a newbie company with a newbie CEO. Nice try.