RE:fire:ct ownershipridingrockets wrote:
Hey Aurum,
You mentioned something that I was thinking of and am in agreement with, more insider purchasing would be nice.... but that being said you may know more than I on this, if they are working on something that would cause a material impact to the company this act (purchasing/selling) would be illegal...
Question for you or someone with a proper answer: At what point in the conversation does an Insider become blocked from purchasing shares? Is it in the boardroom when they made a concious decision to attempt to start something or is it once they actually enter into conversations with a third party company?
Personally I am stuck with what is going on with the cash raised. There is something, highly unlikely it is just 'in case', going on. Has to be.. Why else do this now? Maybe the first one, maybe but doesn't make sense without something in the weeds imo.
I also agree with rocket, It smells like a deal is brewing in the back round here. I hope it's a good one. My guess would be a CBD / THC beverage play of some sort, would make a lot of sense.