Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Supreme Cannabis Company Inc. (The) T.FIRE

The Supreme Cannabis Co Inc is a Canada-based company engaged in the production and sale of medical and recreational cannabis. Its portfolio includes products that address recreational, medical, and wellness consumers. Its brands include BlissCo, Truverra, 7ACRES, Sugarleaf, and Hiway.

TSX:FIRE - Post Discussion

Supreme Cannabis Company Inc. (The) > E-Mail to IR- concerns with managment changes and TSX
View:
Post by Southybird on Sep 25, 2018 12:23pm

E-Mail to IR- concerns with managment changes and TSX

All just wanted to pass on the below- management needs to ACT NOW-  I am not happy with the timing of these managment  changes unless there is more to share with the market before the weeks end- IR is also saying TSX is not a priority -Here is my e-mail I will still continue to hold a long term, but I must say my patience is growing thin with managements inability to increase shareholder value;
 
I am looking for more information as to why the board thought it was a good idea to change the president and ceo roles a month before legalization, this announcement makes no sense, the current board, CEO and President have done nothing to increase visibility of Supreme in the marketplace over the last two years, shareholder value has remained stagnant and you decide this is a good idea? Why not replace John with a real CEO who has experience  and allow the current president to remain in the role, John self admittedly is acting more as an operations Director, this is dissapointing to say the least.
 
 Supreme made this managment announcement and the fiscal results didn’t even get posted on newswire, the market overlooked your fiscal results as it never made it to market, like many other GOOD things that supreme is doing.
 
I read an email that the company is advising shareholders that moving to the TSX is not a priority? 
 
But changing roles a month before legalization is? 
 
This will do nothing to increase shareholder value whereas moving to the TSX adds legitimacy to the company and increases fund /market exposure etc.
 
How do you guys not get that.?
 
I have been a long term shareholder since 2015 and operationally you have build a best in class business, but the board and current managements lack of foresight has reflected negatively in increasing shareholder value to reach that of peers, the gap between Supreme and similar peers is alarming.
 
Unless you guys plan on shocking the market this week I expect things  to remain the same , again I feel the need to contact you regarding this as I think the move yesterday was a mistake and it concerns me greatly that the board wouldn’t have the foresight to hire a new CEO that would create more exposure and add value.
 
Not to mention the fact that the stock price has remained flat through many milestones, clearly there is an internal issue.
Comment by Tomharley on Sep 25, 2018 12:30pm
They will reply back, thanks for your opinion, and carry on being the dead horse stock. John wasnt CEO material from the beginning and stepping down makes me say it. I TOLD YOU SO. Long long ago.
Comment by maritimedreamer on Sep 25, 2018 1:00pm
thank you for sharing. I"m interested to see the type of response that you will recieve..... 
Comment by Southybird on Sep 25, 2018 1:36pm
All, See below response from IR- Again, i have no problem with managment changes, but remain the position that this change should have been more substantial ( Bringing in a new CEO that the market recognizes from the industry or birnging in a CEO from a different industry etc) makes the most sense to me. Tom you are right in indicating John is essentially assuming an operations Manager role, i ...more  
Comment by Tomharley on Sep 25, 2018 3:17pm
Blah blah fluff!
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities
USER FEEDBACK SURVEY ×

Be the voice that helps shape the content on site!

At Stockhouse, we’re committed to delivering content that matters to you. Your insights are key in shaping our strategy. Take a few minutes to share your feedback and help influence what you see on our site!

The Market Online in partnership with Stockhouse