RE:RE:Question to all about GSDL2005It would be a conservative to assume that mineralization stopped hole for hole 2005.
But, hole 2005 has 3.78gpt/119m (from 472m-591m) including 131.5gpt/3m at the end (from 588m-591m), which is an excellent intercept (3.84 gpt x 119m = 456gpt-m. This is not as good as hole 2001 (with 2.94gpt x 257m = 755gpt-m), but much better than hole 2002 (with 1.02gpt x 136m = 138gpt-m. Note that the average grade for the pit constrained is around 0.69gpt (which is in the same range with Fort Knox).
In other words, hole 2005 results confirm high-grade mineralization starting at around 300m (FVL NR) to above 550m depth. Grades over 40gpt-m would be considered economical for OP operation. Holes 2002, 2005 and 2001 are 3.5x, 11.4x, and 18.8x that of 40gpt-m standard respectively.
I would suggest that FVL move north (put the 3rd drill there) by another 100m from 2005, and drill hole F (FVL old nomenclature). Hole F is along the SW-NE trend line heading toward Cleary old workings.
GH11
------------------------------
MaracleMaker wrote: Mineralization stopped at 591 m