RE:RE:RE:NanoXplore and Martinrae International....When I stated the immediately following comments, I was doing so with the comments Martinrea representatives made, when speaking to Martinraes' latest purchase of Effenco assets, in mind.
"Martinrea's representatives have suggested the company's operation of a global automotive parts and components and EV relating manufacturing footprint and Martinrea's various investments are integral to the strategic business development of it's partners, specifically as pertans to NanoXplore and the 50% co-owned VoltaXplore investment enterprise".
We share the same perspective in such regard.
Also, Project Arrow was obviously envisioned to help draw the attention of any would be made to become interested automotive manufacturers to perhaps taking up a capital investment in support of furthering the VoltaXplore enterprise.
I hadn't really cared much for Project Arrow, as I believe it was simply a very cheap way to advertise NanoXplore's wares. That's correct tinkvid, NanoXplore's IP, it's proprietary technological processes and NanoXplore's proven abilities to develop proprietary graphene enhanced battery materials (anodes, electrolytes and cathodes) and NanoXplore's abilities to supply VoltaXplore everything required to actually produce any amount of proven and "qualified" proprietary graphene enhanced battery cells.
Project Arrow served to advertise VoltaXplore and VoltaXplore was always envisioned as serving multiple strategic purposes, one of which is quite clearly to draw the attention of some made to be quite interested "industrial chemicals titans" and the government of Quebec and the government of Canada's attention to providing much needed capital investment for NanoXplore's cause and also facilitating the directed flow of private equity managed capital investments support for NanoXplore's five year strategic business development investments plan associated initiatives.
Yes. I've always suggested VoltaXplore was envisaged by both NanoXplore and Martinrea stakeholders as being "a shiny lure" serving the intended purposes and objectives of both NanoXplore Inc and Martinrea International Inc.
You, tinkvid, stated, "I would like to see Nanoxplore announce producing Graphene from Recycled plastics from car interiors.....Take a step in the direction of the circular economy".
You do recall my series of posts provided here regarding the comments made by a Dow Chemicals representative during a series of interviews.
The Dow-DuPont representative provided comments were precisely regarding, amongst other Dow-DuPont developed proprietary technological processes, the use of recycled vehicles parts and components in order to produce, by way of Dow and partners developed proprietary processes, a non-virgin stream of gases in turn utilized to manufacture better than new polyolefin type thermoplastic.
If you are going to refer to closed loop, massive CO2 reductions benefiting (see the massive, recurring and straight to the bottom line CO2 offset credits forward sales derived revenue stream) environmentally responsible and wholly ESG compliant proprietary technological processes . . .
Suffice to say, you should look into the very proprietary processes already developed by or on behalf of companies such a Dow-DuPont.
By the way, when I posted those Dow executive comments taken from a series of interviews, I also mentioned that the type of graphene enhanced sound insulating foams which XG Sciences was producing and suplying for Ford and other clients - a product line and supporting IP now owned by NanoXplore - can be produced by processing recycled non-virgin and better than new polyolefin type thermoplastic.
Finally, you would have noted that I recently posted some information over at the other investors bulletin board, something which served in emphasizing there exists a certain propriety plasma centric process for decarbonizing methane gas and attaining a very pure graphene material by-product. Such a proprieatry process also produces hydrogen gas by-product and . . . - See Levidian