RE:on a new subject...Yes Dumont.
The lightweighting of graphene enhanced ballistic projectile or bullet proof armour is as real as you breathing.
A certain U.S. based company, the name escapes me at the moment, has most specific intellectual property relating to such a application for graphene.
I'd fully expect such a particular application is off-limits to NanoXplore, as I do recall that there exists a moat having been build around such a lightweighted graphene enhanced armour application and that such a moat has been filled (lol) with company devouring representatives operating on behalf of IP litigation firms and their clients, lol.
I do recall that one of the primary principals representing the company I speak of was a employee of a certain U.S. state policing entity though. I read his employment background and profile at this particular company's website a while back. I may have been The New York State Police.
Any-hoo, the company I am referring to was said to have been suing a Canadian based proprietary developer and manufacturer of graphene-oxide infused medical masks and a company which may have a connection to NanoXplore (I I recall correctly), by way of one of the persons associated with such a company's seeking to develop proprietary graphene enhanced battery cells chemistries and process manufacturing methods for such a Canadian based company.
I know the name of the Canadian based company and graphene oxide infused medical masks developer (a company which also had it's representative invited to join Mr. Wildeboer and other Canadian based company representatives in acompanying Minister Champagne during his late 2022 visit to Japan and Korea).
However, I just can't immediately recall the U.S. based company I referred to, which was said (possibly rumored) to have been seeking to bring legal action against such a Canadian based company, specifically for the IP infringement of the that U.S. company's graphene enhanced ballistic projectile armour aplication.