Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Knight Therapeutics Inc T.GUD

Alternate Symbol(s):  KHTRF

Knight Therapeutics Inc. is a Canada-based specialty pharmaceutical company. The Company's principal business activity includes developing, acquiring, in-licensing, out-licensing, manufacturing, marketing and distributing pharmaceutical products in Canada, Latin America and select international markets. It finances other life sciences companies and secures product distribution rights for Canada and select international markets. The Company invested in life sciences venture capital funds whereby the Company may receive preferential access to healthcare products for Canada and select international markets. It develops pharmaceutical products, including those to treat neglected tropical and rare pediatric diseases. The Company's portfolio consists of pharmaceutical products with molecules and includes both in-licensed products, such as Lenvima, Cresemba, Halaven, Trelstar, Akynzeo, Ambisome as well as products owned (or partially owned) by it, such as Exelon and Impavido.


TSX:GUD - Post by User

Comment by gudisgoodon Feb 17, 2022 6:34am
64 Views
Post# 34437113

RE:RE:Bring back Beaudet (Part II)

RE:RE:Bring back Beaudet (Part II)
Thank you MrMugsy, what a great post.

Yes, the Medison deal didn't work out. If doing bad deals was a continuous thing, I would be worried. But anyone can make a bad deal on a long enough time horizon. Furthermore, this deal wasn't a disaster - it didn't work, and yes there's always an opportunity cost, but certainly we got out of it relatively unscathed even though it went just about as bad one could have imagined. With such limited downside, I'm quite convinced that the deal was +EV, but within that EV there's a range of outcomes from good to bad, and this time it was one of the bad ones. But again, hardly a disaster. In the end, the deal was essentially reversed.

Aside from Medison, what should the company have done differently so far?

Some might say they should have made more deals. But is anyone here critising the management also aware of any deals they missed, and the terms of those deals? Making intelligent decisions with capital means the volume of deals is cyclical. To an extent, the market conditions determine your capability of doing deals. If you're making lots of deals regardless of the market conditions, you're probably making a lot of bad ones as well.

Also, important to note that "one deal" now can be "many deals" depending on how you look at it. The Incyte drugs will be distributed to Brazil, Argentina, Colombia, Mexico, and some other LATAM countries. That's two drugs but 10+ markets.

So anyway, we now have:

- an (almost) integrated platform in the highest-growing pharma market in the world (LATAM),
- several drugs in several markets in a growth phase,
- several market launches in the pipeline,
- a $50M/year drug about to be transferred over,
- more than $40M of operational cash flow (TTM),
- $300M net in cash, marketable securities and financial assets,
- an opportunistic management using excess capital efficiently by taking an advantage of the low share price (with $60M+ spent on buybacks during last year).

In general, I wish people on this board focused more on the business, not the share price. But you can't have everything you wish for. :)
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>