Post by
autofocus111 on Dec 12, 2018 11:59am
So HSE made the same mistake as XON
This is not rocket science. Even then, design mistakes are made. Anyone remember those solid booster rockets?
>>>HOUSTON (Reuters) - An “ineffective” safeguard failed to prevent an explosive mixing of air and fuel at a Husky Energy refinery in Superior, Wisconsin, leading to a blast and fire in the plant’s gasoline-producing unit in April, a U.S. industrial safety group said on Wednesday. Air seeped through a hole in a valve within a fluidic catalytic cracking unit (FCCU), the U.S. Chemical Safety Board (CSB) said, causing an April 26 explosion that led to a massive fire and a 24-hour-long evacuation of residents living within miles of the plant. Husky, according to the CSB, had only considered a failure of the valve when locked open, not a failure when it was closed, according to an updated report the board presented of its months-long investigation at a meeting Wednesday in Superior. The failures leading to the Superior refinery explosion were similar to those that caused a 2015 explosion in an FCCU at a Torrance, California, refinery then owned by Exxon Mobil Corp. Exxon sold the refinery to PBF Energy in 2016.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-refinery-blast-probe-husky/u-s-probe-cites-ineffective-safeguard-in-husky-oil-refinery-blast-idUSKBN1OB23P
Comment by
mrbb on Dec 12, 2018 12:18pm
rocket booster failed due to improper use of O ring as warned by NASA engineers a design flaw. A leaky closed valve is not a design flaw. A valve is not a high tech or custom designed device. My question is - is that failed valve made in china? Even US military aircraft, ships, etc have been infiltrated with Chinese made components
Comment by
Olympic on Dec 12, 2018 2:24pm
What impact does this finding have on HSE's insurance coverage, if any? The CSB seems to suggest a review of industry standards may be appropriate ... e.g. not specific to HSE.
Comment by
autofocus111 on Dec 12, 2018 5:40pm
@Olympic Yes it sounds like an industry-wide problem. Not sure if company engineers are failing to properly spec out component requirements due to knowledge gaps, or if it's a supplier quality issue as mrbb suggests.