Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Imperial Metals Corp T.III

Alternate Symbol(s):  IPMLF

Imperial Metals Corporation is a Canada-based exploration, mine development and operating company. The Company’s holdings include the Mount Polley mine (100%), the Huckleberry mine (100%), the Red Chris mine (30%). The Company also holds a portfolio of about 23 greenfield exploration properties in British Columbia. The Mount Polley copper/gold mine in south-central British Columbia is owned 100% by Mount Polley Mining Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. The property encompasses about 24,096 hectares (ha) consisting of seven mining leases and 52 mineral claims. The Huckleberry copper mine in west-central British Columbia is 100% owned by Huckleberry Mines Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. The property encompasses about 25,767 ha, consisting of two mining leases and 49 mineral claims. Red Chris Development Company Ltd., a subsidiary of the Company, owns a 30% beneficial interest in the Red Chris copper/gold mine in northwest British Columbia.


TSX:III - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Post by Indicatoron Aug 18, 2014 8:05pm
171 Views
Post# 22853746

"arm’s-length inquiry, not some backside-covering exercise"

"arm’s-length inquiry, not some backside-covering exercise"
"

It seems reasonable to conclude that the government’s system of inspection and oversight must be seriously flawed, since it either failed to identify or to remedy the structural or operational defects which precipitated the dam’s failure.

So, we need an independent inquiry. The government says it means to have one, but we need a genuine arm’s-length inquiry, not some backside-covering exercise involving industry and government “experts” on whose watch this occurred.

We don’t need the fox and the watchdog interviewing each other to find out what happened to the chickens. We know what happened to the chickens. What we don’t know is why the watchdog failed to prevent it."

https://www.vancouversun.com/news/Stephen+Hume+Mount+Polley+inquiry+must+independent/10126049/story.html

Bullboard Posts

USER FEEDBACK SURVEY ×

Be the voice that helps shape the content on site!

At Stockhouse, we’re committed to delivering content that matters to you. Your insights are key in shaping our strategy. Take a few minutes to share your feedback and help influence what you see on our site!

The Market Online in partnership with Stockhouse