RE:More readable version...Awesome post, thanks for sharing your research! That's great stuff...Would like your opinion on something that has been bugging me. Why would the Congo agree to only 15% and the obligation to pay for it? Shouldn't the Congo be entitled from a strategic natural resource perspective to much more for free, plus a royalty premium on the back end due to their circumstance as war-torn and empoverished? To the extent that Komoas size, depth and grade is so good, more of that share from the deposit should be given back to the host country, no? For example, Canada recently vetoed the takeover of Potash of Saskatchewan by BHP Biliton, on the grounds that the Potash deposit was a Canadian strategic natural resource. Komoa is far more valuable to the Congo, than Potash corp is to Canada...and the Congolese are far poorer per capita than the average Canadian.