Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Just Energy Group Inc. (Canada) T.JE


Primary Symbol: JENGQ

Just Energy Group Inc is a retail energy provider specializing in electricity and natural gas commodities and bringing energy efficient solutions and renewable energy options to customers. Geographically, the company is operating in the United States and Canada, Just Energy serves residential and commercial customers.


OTCPK:JENGQ - Post by User

Comment by GEEEon Jan 21, 2014 8:53am
193 Views
Post# 22114652

RE:Cold = bonanza for NG supply chain

RE:Cold = bonanza for NG supply chain
big correction
when calculating the  example  of  people  in Maine
 who  hedged  with  JE at  top of  NG prices in 2007
all their   " gains  "  should  be   "loses"  and  vice  versa
the  correct  part  below  
Take  IE  Maine  from above  table
 2007  lock  up  at   $16.90  ( NG price =  $ 10)

2008=17.47 =  relative  gain  57 c  ( NG price =  $8 to  12 )
2009 = 16.43 = loss  47 c ( NG price =  $ 8 to  7 )
2010=    14.14 = loss $  2.76  ( NG price =  $ 7 to 6 )
2011=    14.20 =  loss$  2.70  ( NG price =  $ 6  to  4 )
2012 = 15.94  =  loss 96 c  ( NG price =  $ 4  = bottom)
2013  looks like  aver  16 =   90 c  loss ( NG price =  $ 4.8 --  3.6=  second bottom -- 4.4 )

LOOKS   3 TIMES  CUT IN  NG PRICE    DID NOT  CAUSE   RELATIVE  3  x   LOSES
  FOR  PEOPLE  WHO LOCKED  UP  WITH  JE   AT  THE  TOP  
 IN  CASE  OF  MAINE   ( OTHER MARKETS  DIFFER  BUT NOT THAT  MUCH )

- THEY  PAID  IN  AVER   10-15 %  more
during those  5  Y  THAN  IF THEY WOULDN'T  HEDGE  .

But  1   week  like  this  one   when burning  is   2-3  times  aver  and
floating price  jumped  400%  up   will  reduce  their
 aver  yearly loses  big  time  
Such  1  week  at  floating  price   equals  10 weeks= 2.5  months
   of  aver   yearly  cost;
Bullboard Posts
USER FEEDBACK SURVEY ×

Be the voice that helps shape the content on site!

At Stockhouse, we’re committed to delivering content that matters to you. Your insights are key in shaping our strategy. Take a few minutes to share your feedback and help influence what you see on our site!

The Market Online in partnership with Stockhouse