RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Technical420 reportI see....you clearly don't understand that a double negative actually means a positive....ie. they don't like a cfo that won't cook the books is the same as saying that they like a cfo to cook the books....so digest that however you like....the not-so-subtle nuances of the English language seem to fail you....
As for 'proof' of double booking.....prove it....and hopefully not with more opinion or tweets from your alter-ego.....
Keep it transparent fladdi....doing great....
allibabba wrote: Ok right! First of all my comment was "they don't like cfo's that won't cook the books". Never once said the cfo cooked the books, so that's out of the way. Secondly, there is proof that labs and cronos had "accounting discrepancies" and had to re-adjust earnings because of double booking revenue from flower and oils changing hands between the companies. Digest it however you want.