RE:RE:RE:RE:Insider trading. QContinuum1 wrote: Do yourself a favour and look up 'materiality'. And once you've done that, remind yourself that just because you 'think' something has happened, doesn't mean it actually has and certainly not in the way you believe.
As an example (again), simply because they may have an agreement with some entity in Brazil, that agreement itself may not be material given there may not be any hard values associated with it. Simply inking an agreement that states that someday we might sell something may not meet the materiality requirements.
You're all wound up because you have convinced yourself that LABS has done this or that when in fact they haven't done anything of the sort, for had they, they would have announced it.
you lost me...
all i said initially was that there have been no insider Buys of stock eventhough they think MPL is undervalued, and my contention was that show shareholders by purchasing some shares on the open market, dont just grant yourself options.
then someone chimed in that they cant because they have material info and are blackouted from buying and if they do they would be breaking the Law ...
( so what this means that the theory of the MPL crew knowing something material is BS so there is nothing preventing them from selling which they have done...... no buying by any of them so are we undervalued in their eyes )
then i said well if they are blackout from buying then they are blackout from selling as well and they have done alot of selling ...actually all selling since 2021 ... with proof of public market sales.. so if its not legal as asserted by whoever it was then the sales would be not Legal either...
i am so far from wound up it would boggle your mind
the public disclosures of sales on SEDI are fact i invite you to prove otherwise