Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Laurentian Bank of Canada T.LB.PR.H


Primary Symbol: T.LB Alternate Symbol(s):  LRCDF | LAUCF

Laurentian Bank of Canada (the Bank) is a Canada-based provider of financial services to its personal, commercial and institutional customers. The Bank operates in Canada and the United States. Its segments include Personal Banking, Commercial Banking and Capital Markets. The Personal Banking segment caters to the financial needs of retail clients. The Commercial Banking segment caters to the... see more

TSX:LB - Post Discussion

View:
Post by Northforce13 on May 31, 2024 1:23pm

Software

I own a small bit of this, recall looking at their b/s valuation of intangible software asset and questioning to myself the true value of that asset.  I guess we get a partical answer in today's writeoff.  

Capitalizing software costs seems like an easy lever management can pull to inflate earnings.  If you want higher earnings, lean towards the opinion that software costs should be capitalized.  Then every X years or so, kitchen sink a big writeoff of this expense, while claiming "adjusted" earnings are doing fine.  

What a horribly run company, with such being the case for decades.  This would seem to make it clear that the board of directors is incompetent. 

Well, on further humorous thought re the board of directors, I guess they were competent at fending off and spurning offers to buy the bank, thereby ensuring their continued tenure and compensation, with such efforts costing share holders a mere 15 million in strategic review costs.

I still shake my head in disgust at this.  Simplified; someone made an offer to the board of directors for the bank.  Rather than take the offer to share holders (and lose their jobs as they would become redundant), then spent 15 million dollars saying no.
Be the first to comment on this post
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities