RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:SeweloOne would think if this is indeed true, that we are talking about stones of this size, (quality?) that a 45% share, should be a "material" amount? No?
I assume/believed that the Sewelo stone was incuded in our last tender. I thought I had read that somewhere, re: Lucara statement. If so then that tender has some big upside left in it, 55% of what appears to be some pretty big diamonds.
Going to have to go and see if I can confirm why I thought that. Or if it really matters as amount received was "non-material".
In any event this is anything but clear and seems to only muddy the already very non-transparent operations of this company.
Even with this news and some BNN coverage we can't even muster enough buying interest to test resistance and gap at the $1.015 area. Sad really. Yet here I am .......
nyoni wrote: From that NYT link :-
"Vuitton’s partners in Antwerp are building a scanner able to see through the stone’s coating, though with the imaging already in place, including a CT scan, they have estimated it may yield a 904-carat cushion-cut diamond, an 891-carat Oval or several stones of between 100 and 300 carats."
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/15/style/sewelo-diamond.html