Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Excelsior Mining Corp T.MIN

Alternate Symbol(s):  EXMGF

Excelsior Mining Corp. is a Canada-based mineral exploration and production company. The Company owns and operates the Gunnison Copper Project in Cochise County, Arizona. The Gunnison Copper Project is an in-situ recovery copper extraction project that is permitted to produce approximately 125 million pounds per year of copper cathode production. The Company also owns the past producing Johnson Camp Mine and a portfolio of exploration projects, including the Peabody Sill and the Strong and Harris deposits. Its 100% owned Johnson Camp Mine is located over one mile from the wellfield. The Strong and Harris copper-zinc-silver deposit is located about 1.3 miles north of its Johnson Camp SX-EW facility. The Company is also evaluating the oxide and sulfide potential of all of its mining assets.


TSX:MIN - Post by User

Post by dollpartzon Jun 25, 2021 4:31pm
424 Views
Post# 33452069

From Dougnill

From Dougnill
Listened to the 6/24/21 PI Financial webinar about Cu explorers-developers-producers.

Excelsior mining was the only "producer" my notes are:

- Produced 185,000 99.999% cu cathode in Q1
- Still wrestling with the CO2 problem
- In their initial engineering test they knew about the CO2 and thought it would just flush out, but it gets trapped in the ore fissures and reduces the Cu solution process.
- Showed the previous acid - water flush cycling as the current solution.
- But they have found that the rate of gallons/minute (g/m) of extraction trends up after each acid - water flush cycle.
- They start off at 10g/m - 30g/m - 75 g/min - 110g/m
- They are learning how to operate the well field under these constraints.
- No mention of any other possible solution, other than water, to the problem.
- Water availability and recycling and evaportation may be an aspect of the process that was not anticipated.
- Still thinking of skipping the Phase II but may have to pull forward some of the investments forward.
- Overall still being able to produce but a a slower rate, or having to have more wells in operation for the projected rate of Cu production.

- M+I resource is about 5 billion pounds of Cu. This process will recover only about 50% of that.

douginil Nice overall summary of today's call. Please note that it was always assumed that only 50% of copper would be recovered. That is built into the original financial estimates.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>