Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Markland AGF Precious Metals Corp T.MPM



TSX:MPM - Post by User

Post by lawnmoredanon Sep 18, 2005 12:05pm
203 Views
Post# 9565848

Debating the Outlook on Uranium

Debating the Outlook on UraniumDebate is good,confirms direction good or bad.Nothing worst then a bunch of yes men masageing ego's.Dines point is one I'am investing on and have done extremely well so far todate on uranium stocks.But one must keep there eyes open to the real threats to this concept.Pebble reactors-the use of "Thorium" instead of uranium,to mention two.China has and is perfecting the use of the "PEBBLE REACTOR".India has reactors useing thorium now as we speak.The pebble reactor,holds its uranium in 8 or 9 gram balls(300-450,000) surrounded by a special graphite I see as using substantially less uranium per year then conventional reactors.The pebble reactor holds its uranium for a "THREE YEAR" period before needing to be refilled.This to me means these types of reactors "if" they become widely accepted,will use substantially less uranium per reactor,also they can be easly tooled to run on thorium instead of uranium.Bush is looking intensely at the pebble reactor concept.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>