RE: This changes everythingI was not trying for a direct comparison, but trying to indicate that you need repeatable results where large stones are considered, and G.K. needs to give up more stones >5 c to be considered up amongst deposits that are famed for large stones, e.g. Premier in S. Africa. i.e. it needs to be unequivocably established that this stone was not a fluke.
To many people are getting over-excited and making statements along the lines of "this will be a ten-bagger in three years" and so on, to paraphrase. It may be that the mine is extremely successful, and share price goes way up. But from the evidence currently available, that is hard to say, and people who come out on this board who yak on about how great things are are not contributing anything worthwhile aside from giving gullible people false pretenses of the project. Critical thinking is a necessary component of anyone's due diligence.
Other items, like the money necessary to make the mine happen, must also be taken into consideration when regarding the recommendation on the stock.