Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Nano One Materials Corp. T.NANO

Alternate Symbol(s):  NNOMF

Nano One is a technology company with a patented and scalable industrial process for the production of low cost, high performance cathode powders used in lithium ion batteries. These unique materials are being designed to add value to electric vehicles and grid storage batteries in the global push for a zero-emission future.

TSX:NANO - Post Discussion

Nano One Materials Corp. > Tesla and One-Pot
View:
Post by Lawisfun on Feb 22, 2024 2:49pm

Tesla and One-Pot

This Tesla patent (link below) uses the term "one-pot" 14 times.  It may have nothing to do with Nano One.  But if not, it is somewhat concerning since the patent claims:


"...a goal was established to develop a “one-pot” method".


The patent is not for manufacturing of CAM.  This Tesla patent is for an improved method to make electrolyte additives (using "one-pot method).  But it is strange that Tesla would insist on using the term "one-pot" in this Tesla patent.
  

I'm curious if there is any relationship to the recently announced Nano One patent TW 110137964 which made CAM using their "one-pot" method which resulted in a simplied electrolyte that requires fewer additives.


Link to Tesla "one-pot" Patent:

https://patents.justia.com/patent/20200392091#:~:text=The%20method%20includes%20the%20steps,in%20a%20third%20organic%20solvent
Comment by Lawisfun on Feb 22, 2024 3:02pm
Since this Tesla patent is public information and references the term "one-pot" and has a stated goal to develop a "one-pot" process, surely Nano One can comment to confirm or deny if they have anything to do with this patent without infringing on any potential/hypothetical NDA with Tesla.
Comment by Lawisfun on Feb 22, 2024 4:46pm
As far as I can tell, Nano One has no trademark on the term, "one-pot". Seems odd to me.  Maybe someone can help confirm.  https://uspto.report/company/Nano-One-Materials-Corp
Comment by contrap127 on Feb 22, 2024 5:32pm
Of course, the term ONE POT SYNTHESIS cannot be protected exclusively, as it is usually a general process engineering term.   https://www.google.com/search?q=One+pot+synthesis+in+battery+production&client=firefox-b-d&sca_esv=1e0a15d19e51fa54&ei=GcjXZYHSBsilkdUPw-eOmAg&ved=0ahUKEwjBwoSI_b-EAxXIUqQEHcOzA4MQ4dUDCBA&uact=5&oq=One+pot+synthesis+in+battery+production ...more  
Comment by Lawisfun on Feb 22, 2024 7:47pm
Agreed nice to hear.  But I suppose there is no further reason to believe Nano One supported that specific Tesla patent.  Oh well.   The new Nano One patent where they made a cathode that simplifies the electrolyte by requiring fewer additives sounds fantastic. I suppose they are adding the electrolyte additives to the One Pot process similar to how they add the cathode coatings ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities