Post by
Lawisfun on Feb 22, 2024 2:49pm
Tesla and One-Pot
This Tesla patent (link below) uses the term "one-pot" 14 times. It may have nothing to do with Nano One. But if not, it is somewhat concerning since the patent claims:
"...a goal was established to develop a “one-pot” method".
The patent is not for manufacturing of CAM. This Tesla patent is for an improved method to make electrolyte additives (using "one-pot method). But it is strange that Tesla would insist on using the term "one-pot" in this Tesla patent.
I'm curious if there is any relationship to the recently announced Nano One patent TW 110137964 which made CAM using their "one-pot" method which resulted in a simplied electrolyte that requires fewer additives.
Link to Tesla "one-pot" Patent:
https://patents.justia.com/patent/20200392091#:~:text=The%20method%20includes%20the%20steps,in%20a%20third%20organic%20solvent
Comment by
Lawisfun on Feb 22, 2024 3:02pm
Since this Tesla patent is public information and references the term "one-pot" and has a stated goal to develop a "one-pot" process, surely Nano One can comment to confirm or deny if they have anything to do with this patent without infringing on any potential/hypothetical NDA with Tesla.
Comment by
Lawisfun on Feb 22, 2024 4:46pm
As far as I can tell, Nano One has no trademark on the term, "one-pot". Seems odd to me. Maybe someone can help confirm. https://uspto.report/company/Nano-One-Materials-Corp