846 million tonnes - silicate peridotites.
It's all about the silicates.
Greatest amount of tonnage.
Silicates hold their own in metal %
Silicates
= sulphide metal + salt ionic solution ( don't get me started - 1/2 digest assays ) lol
Silicates overlay sulphides like an - icing cap.
Silicates
have to be mined first. Yet...saw
86% reduction. Silicated were first to be tested 2012 using 80% - worked really well.
Silicates were fine ground then blended. ( composite 80% peridotite )
Right Side Chart = 2012 Recoveries 
486 million tonnes
should've read
400 million tonnes adhearing to
2012 pea mineral percentages. .
2012 met studies tested
80% peridotites. I had to stick to this chart - it also revealed ( chromium + titanium )
And
two nickels strictly in, Peridotites. ( each with own separate - columb 3 )
0.77% Ni if combined.
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53301316921_92a17827fc_z.jpg Others may ask...
Why not use the 2015 stats
where they actuallly reported
846 million tonnes inferred ?
Simple answer ?
I wanted to.
But.... 2014 / 2015
aligned the extraction towards sulphides.... 2 increases of resource in this 2015
329 million tonnes m + i
846 million tonnes inferred
They catered the me studies to - sulphides.
329 million tonnes with only 1 - 10% peridotite ( proves this )
Junior at this point in time sifted former drills, reassayed, relogged, digitized
and performed new drilling. Most former drills were only 100m to 300m.
= silicate upper
2017 axed silicates - inferred resource = dropped by 86%
= silicate peridotite was claimed difficult ( yet... 2012 was perfectyly fine )
= forcing me to use 2012 resource size ( 400 million t + silicate met studies )
Why did i choose
" gold " as a buyout attractant ?
Least mineral in resource.
Leaving all else tabled
= Good Temp to resolve this Wellgreen.
There are
hardly any posters on the bullboard. Performance since 2017 = slow and axed 86% of inferred.
Most shareholders
would move on to another stock. Hardly any posters =
Suggests few common shareholders. I can't dismiss another
Capital company hasn't been collecting cheapies.
Which... if i'm right....
There's far less small holders of shares.
Electrum + Drake
Who else ?
Major miner...? Several Capital Companies ?
If my theory is correct...
there are very few common shareholders.
Let's then ask...
Who would
pitch hit for the remaining shareholders ? Present and Former ncp employess have worked for - majors.
lol
Which is why i wrote the previuos post.
Outlinning just -
gold All remaining metals left on the table
Not a share value.
Rather a face spot value of, 2 categories of assumed inferred gold.
Applying 0.04 g Au to.... 846 + 147 million tonnes.
All other metals....
Ni, Cu, Co, Pt, Pd, Fe, Mg, Cr, Ti, Exotics, + potential silica Areogel. Largest share holders use these tabled metals to invite
other stakeholders in and together = pay the assumed gold content.
Take Private or, other.
I could tabulate what's transpired since 2016 into
an alpha numeric equation and i'm positive... the equation favors others.
2023 pfs anyone ? lol
Hence - larger players should buy the remaining common
shareholders shares - wrap it up.
If they drag and lag... given cuurent world affairs ?
That's just not right.
Cheers...