RE:RE:Jay TaylorBuccaneerIsland wrote: WisGuy1 wrote: @Danielh Message from Jay Taylor in is week publication: '' Meanwhile, companies I commented on this week continue to do extremely well with their exploration programs, even if their share prices got hammered this week. I didn’t have time to comment on Novo Resources this week but I did interview Quinton Hennigh for my radio show next week. The breakthrough mechanical separation progress is breathtakingly amazing. What was demonstrated in trials this week is the ability to recover 100% of the nuggets at Egina while leaving 99% of the non-gold-bearing material at the mine site. And with this there is the promise of extremely low capital costs compared to conventional milling technologies. Truly amazing! Be sure to listen to Quinton on my show next week.. '
With all due respect WG, I dont think Jay is too bright. One way or the other.
Buck
Could Jay NOT realise the sampling was not done at Egina?
Could Jay NOT realise the test were done in a lab in Germany?
Could Jay NOT realise the equipment used was lab equipment not the product used in Australian labs?
Could Jay NOT realise only a tiny sample of caferfully screened gravel was used and it was salted with carefully selected gold nuggets?
Could Jay NOT realise that tests were not conducted scientifically... they may have had to run the sample a100 times to get the result they wanted to publish.
One thing that is certain is that some devoted NOVO Holders will realise these things and that they have been duped by another Novo Party Trick.