Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Novo Resources Corp T.NVO

Alternate Symbol(s):  NSRPF

Novo Resources Corp. is engaged in evaluating, acquiring, exploring, and developing natural resource properties with a focus on gold. The Company explores and develops its prospective land package covering approximately 7,500 square kilometers in the Pilbara region of Western Australia, along with the 22 square kilometer Belltopper project in the Bendigo Tectonic Zone of Victoria, Australia. The Company operates through two segments: care & maintenance operations and exploration operations.


TSX:NVO - Post by User

Comment by mrbubbaon Nov 22, 2020 12:30pm
122 Views
Post# 31948947

RE:RE:RHINO IS SMARTER?

RE:RE:RHINO IS SMARTER?My reading comprehension is real good, as I have obviously made points above which local basher denizens cannot effectively vitiate.

All these reputable people/companies put their money and reputations on the line with Novo, and an internet chatroom pretenders posit they are smarter than they?

Reasonable people would not blindly bash reputable people/companies - unless of course they have a different agenda. Facts from bashers would be a welcome addition. For example, an interview with the employee at Sumitomo explaining why he might have thought Novo was a "roll of the dice" might be a good start. Alas, no such interview exists, because bashers have no effective argument supported by facts. 
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>