RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:MORIARTY = VERY ENTERTAINING !FishinFerHooks wrote: TXRogers wrote: FishinFerHooks wrote: TXRogers wrote: FishinFerHooks wrote: GreenGecko wrote: Like him or not, Bob Moriarty is a treasure.
His latest book on investing is an afternoon read, but contains lessons that last an investing lifetime.
I expect his book on Novo will be most entertaining and I too will buy a copy.
Hes another of Q's sausage machines. Q feeds in pork, beef, and anything else on one end and it comes out the other end as a nicely wrapped sausage.
I can do my own thinking.
Hooks
Look, the guy is a fellow poster and has been an endless source of debate and entertainment. That's priceless as far as I am concerned.
And the amount of free material offered to date on his blog sites, as well as his animated podcast interviews - albeit in the absence of the Queen's language - has also been significant.
So, I think everyone should buy and read his books. If you then find his posts not to be palatable or to your liking, you have additional material to pull on and debate. Makes for even better entertainment.
After all, no one is suggesting that you should not think for yourself. But maybe read and absorb first, and then you can better think for yourself secondly.
Works more effectively that way I think.
Tx
Would you spend your time reading hari krishna pamphlets before deciding if you wanted to be a hari?
No thanks Tx. I know enough to know hes ignorant so nothing that comes after interests me.
Hooks
Ya sure, why not? Especially if the pamphlets have pictures.
I have seen all the Gilligan Island episodes as well. And I still think it's quality TV.
You're not making any sense to me.
Tx
Well then lets take one example. Hes antimask. To me any antimasker is ignorant. And if hes ignorant on masks he most prbly ignornant on many things. So why would I listen to him let alone follow his advice on anything, and in particular on anything mining when I have done mining and I doubt he has. So I make sense to me Tx. Thats what matters.
Hooks
No, that is not ignorance.
Ignorance is taking a position on a specific matter and not explaining the rationale. It is this absence of a reasoned explanation which is in fact the true ignorance.
Especially prone are the ones that are not so well read.
Tx