Novo Resources Corp T.NVO

DOC: FALSE CORPORATE PRESENTATION?

[mrbubba]

Per the Corporate Presentation on Novo’s website:

Beaton’s Creek - Shallow and outcropping with no need for significant pre-strip (page 8). And, on page 17, titled “Growing Beatons Creek Shallow Resources”, there is a picture with a 200 meter key – and it appears that the upper portion is well within 20 meters, with the rest appearing at less than 100 meters.

Karatha – See page 29, where it appears all the prospective conglomerate is within 40 meters of the surface. And it looks like to my untrained eye that they have drilled multiple holes confirming same.

Egina – Same for Egina at page 32, except the targeted mineralization appears all within less than 20 meters of the surface.

ARE YOU SAYING THAT’S ALL A LIE?

QH scamming us all?

Please advise.

[DocCoppr]

This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy

[DocCoppr]

This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy

[TXRogers]

Now you know where Ed stuffed his Tupperware.  Where no one will be able to retrieve it. Tx

[DocCoppr]

This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy

[TXRogers]

Well Bubs:  The best way to break down these discussions is not by truth or lies, but into two basic camps of expectations - one camp believes in the positive economics of Novo's Pilbara strategy, and the other camp believes it's all just folly.  And simply a giant sandbox sprinkled with negligible traces of gold dust. That's the basic core of all these arguments.  

[ValuePro]

A word on bashers and other non-believers. IMO, they all fall into two camps:  1) those who have some personal grudge against the company or someone within it, usually a board member, or 2) those who expect monetary gain from being negative.  In both cases, any argument is useless.  One should either not respond or simply pull the "ignore" trigger.  It's the

[TXRogers]

No VP, I don't believe it's that extreme. I do not see so personal with anyone here, despite the banter. Tx

[ValuePro]

"I do not see so personal with anyone here, despite the banter." I was addressing the issue in general.  However, our contributor who shows up under a new alias at least weekly clearly holds a grudge.  He says as much in confessing to being denied a bid. 

[TXRogers]

I know him.  It's not true. Tx

[waitingstill]

Perhaps TX but lately he has gotten much more personal and direct essentially calling QH a fraud, liar and charlatan even though not using those words perhaps. He has suggested that QH's comments during interviews are intentionally misleading to investors. Seems more personal to me than perhaps 3 or 4 weeks ago...

[ValuePro]

Hey, no matter.  I accept your observation, though I keep putting him on "ignore". Still, I was speaking in general when you objected to my saying, ... "IMO, they all fall into two camps:  1) those who have some personal grudge against the company or someone within it, usually a board member, or 2) those who expect monetary gain from being negative." By "in

[likeike]

Well in general you will have to put up with naysayers for another 6 weeks if we get no hiccups. Production will somehow make them evaporate and keep them a thing of the  past. Along the way the cross to the big board could be a traumatic event to some. It would not surprize me to see the stock drop to below $2 next week for your last best buy opportunity. Start ups can be tricky

[TXRogers]

That's the best way if you get annoyed, VP.  No big deal. And yes, that PoG ascending is a big driver.  Nothing better than a good tailwind to move things along faster. Tx

[mrbubba]

AGREED on the two camps. Respectfully DISAGREE on the ignore thing. Yes I have ignored one or two (specifically the old guy who writes the same post about his TA prowess EVERY post, OldFox?). However, just as I am with politics, I actually VALUE the thoughts and opinions of those who disagree with me, as it challenges me to understand WHY I think they are wrong. Take that Doc Copper guy - if the