Time to get back to reality. First a claim was made that Matt said his company shares were overvalued.
That is 100% lie. As such I'll be reporting that information to Onc I.R. To instigate liablous litigation.
Going on with your convoluted " evidence" is a lot of conjecture.
Beyond a possible blackout, it is quite possible they were/ are in negotiations, preventing an insider trade such as that.
All we know for sure, the options were available.
Assuming Matt did or did not exercise the options, is based on plenty of information we know nothing about.
Why he did & did not report ? Or did not? Exercise.
Neither of which validates your statement that Matt said the sp was overvalued.
Everyone on here, myself included uses creative freedom with their statements.
However stating that Matt said/ indicated or implied that the SP is/ was overvalued is a 100% lie.
Onc has had its share of bad timing the last few months.
As a shareholder, I take extream exception to people out & out lying , especially when it implies a direct. Quote of the CEO.
Funny, the same FUDsters work real hard to discredit Onc mangement as missleading etc, All the while doing exactly that them selves.
Have a good day all