Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Pilbara Minerals Ord Shs T.PLS


Primary Symbol: PILBF

Pilbara Minerals Limited is an Australia-based lithium company. The Company is primarily engaged in the exploration, development, and mining of minerals in Australia. Its 100% owned Pilgangoora hard-rock lithium operation is located approximately 120 kilometers (kms) from Port Hedland in Western Australia’s resource-rich Pilbara region. The operation consists of two processing plants: the Pilgan Plant, located on the northern side of the Pilgangoora area and produces spodumene and tantalite concentrates, and the Ngungaju Plant is located to the south produces spodumene concentrate. It owns 70% of the Mt Francisco project, which is located 50 km south-west of the Pilgangoora Project and hosts the large occurrence of outcropping pegmatites located nearby to Port Hedland. It is also pursuing a proposed downstream joint venture (JV) for the development of an approximately 43,000 tons per annum lithium carbonate equivalent (LCE) lithium chemical conversion facility in South Korea.


OTCPK:PILBF - Post by User

Post by aggmanon Oct 16, 2014 5:36pm
144 Views
Post# 23035872

to frozen in Ontario

to frozen in Ontariowell, too early to be frozen here in North Bay - but give her 6 weeks.

to respond:
  • Polaris started shipping in 2007 and shipped 1.15M tons in 2007 from the Orca quarry (as it had started production that year).
  • When I think of cycles I think 7 years
  • we can't compare 2014 to 2007 for a number of reasons; or we can but need a number of caveats, here goes:
    • it was start up in 07 and 08 so material is priced for market entry
    • the world started to fall apart in mid-2008 - so you have a monumental dislocation occuring; and vols tank in 2009 - 2011, and maybe price softens
    • In 2008 - pricing was 12.75/ton
    • in 2012 q3 and q 4 and through 2013 and h1 2014 pricing was between $12.90 - $13.70
  • credit where it is due - and its what i would expect - is that through a brutal recession - PLS basically maintained price and in the last 8 quarters got modest improvement cf 2008.
  • they did their restructuring - loans, property sales and all that ulcer creating stuff - survival mode and pricing product in those dark years was prob not the highest priority - survival was.  they did a commendable job.
  • now we are sailing in clearer skies - but i add one more step to create a trilogy - price, volume and unit cost (reduction) and the last one is quite powerful also.
  • Now in 2014 the company is clipping along at a 1.0 m tpa at $13.00/ton for orca sand and gravel.  We have also seen a 1.2M quarter and a profit in that quarter.
  • increasing volumes does wonders for rducing unit costs in a business of this scale (well for any business - look at the majors in the bulks - they claim greater margin at lower prices thanks to more units).
  • even if price remains at $13/ton for Orca sand and gravel - and they do 1.1 - 1.2M in SF Bay - they probably have green numbers.
  • You are correct on pricing - they should be doing better in this more bouyant environment - they should be pushing through price improvement at or better than 8% p.a.
  • Volume: clearly add Port of Long Beach - gradual sensible entry and they add another 200,000 tons per Q as they start in that market at higher ASPS - maybe $17-$20/ton and that is juice to the bottom line.
  • Think of a business configured to do 4.5M in SFO and 1.5M in LA - with higher ASPs and reduced unit cost and that is fantastic enterprise.
  • Then leverage your excellent infrastructure and push eagle rock (Hard rock) or this other resource through it (at higher ASPs) and that takes up up a gear.
  • Then build out the front door  - another port in LA, San Diego, and you are in terrific shape - and it will be worth $800M. 
So, dont under estimate the lowering of unit costs, even with flat prices.

Absolutely, management needs to sieze the initiative in the Bay and start getting 8-15% per annum price improvements.

And go about the development of the business per plan - over the next 3 years.

In that time Cali's demand side will be kind (and then also coupled with scarcity of aggs in Cali will enable pricing to be improved).

In normal cycles - Cali gets the best price increases. VMC have a big business there - more in the south, and central vallet, as do CEMEX and Heidelberg - and they exhibit rational price leadership in markets.  Looks like the same can be said for the majors in SFO.

I hope this helps.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>