Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Pilbara Minerals Ord Shs T.PLS


Primary Symbol: PILBF

Pilbara Minerals Limited is an Australia-based lithium company. The Company is primarily engaged in the exploration, development, and mining of minerals in Australia. Its 100% owned Pilgangoora hard-rock lithium operation is located approximately 120 kilometers (kms) from Port Hedland in Western Australia’s resource-rich Pilbara region. The operation consists of two processing plants: the Pilgan Plant, located on the northern side of the Pilgangoora area and produces spodumene and tantalite concentrates, and the Ngungaju Plant is located to the south produces spodumene concentrate. It owns 70% of the Mt Francisco project, which is located 50 km south-west of the Pilgangoora Project and hosts the large occurrence of outcropping pegmatites located nearby to Port Hedland. It is also pursuing a proposed downstream joint venture (JV) for the development of an approximately 43,000 tons per annum lithium carbonate equivalent (LCE) lithium chemical conversion facility in South Korea.


OTCPK:PILBF - Post by User

Comment by seatleslimon Nov 25, 2015 8:27am
129 Views
Post# 24323006

RE:RE:New Low

RE:RE:New LowCurrent valuation doesn't make much sense to me. Lumpy quarters were always going to be the case with a single asset company. Orca is easily a top ten property in Vulcans portfolio (see annual report), based on reserves and volume alone. Add in the specialty nature of Orca's grade and declining reserves in one of the country's largest growth markets and it would be a crown jewel even in their portfolio, ignoring LA. Other than a massive property in Mexico on Gulf they have exactly one property doing more than 3mm tons per year in volume (Chicago). Also ignoring that Orca already has a 40% plus market share in the Bay area; likely close to 100% for high spec applications. Also ignoring they themselves are another 25-30% of that market. Who knows what the end of the year brings in the ugly Canadian natural resource space, but it seems to me than PLS has already fallen well below a price that Vulcan would eagerly pay to create a 70% market share in a top five market. (and, no, that's not based on current gross margin or ebitda multiple) I personally think the Hanson negotiation is noise. How does US Concrete participate in a pour like the one on the tower in SF without Pier 94 supply, ignoring the proposition that they've been using the best material and would tolerate going backwards.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>