RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: CriminalsI would think, Kherson, that if there was fraud at Open Range, the acquiring company would have discovered it by now and would have engaged in litigation. Afterall, they now handle the accounting books and would know. Rather, what IS odd here is that Dawson and the other no goods running PSN had clean histories with previous ventures. Why start a fraud now? And why would ALL of these dogs not have cashed in instead of just a couple? THAT is what perplexes me. Yet I simply do not see how the number of tanks actually bringing revenue could be so hugely overstated. It's like saying you have a fleet of 440 rental cars and all of them are rented for the day. It is NOT hard to see that payment coming in from those 440 car renters for the day. But to then say, aaahhh, big oversight,,,,we only rented 90 cars instead of 440 as we publicly stated is too much of a miss to believe that anything but fraud could be what has happened. Sadly, they covered themselves by stating they could have accounting irregularities right in their quartely financials! So they may be off the hook. That constitutes the most brazen ploy I hae EVER seen--"Just tell them in our quarterly filings that our accounting can't be trusted and see if anyone even reads the things". Well, obviously not many people do, the heavily promoted stock soared, and a couple of insiders cashed in. Where was the analyst community who were touting PSN. Didn't they have their glasses on and should they have read those>