RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Steel IndustryYou "have no interest in Pyr one way or the other"... so you're here to save us all in our investment quest?
No one is defensive; I'm merely adding facts to your conjecture. I'm a facts guy, good or bad; go through my posts. If anyone is level-headed it's me.
raphaelle2 wrote: Dont shoot the messenger . Why are you so defensive. Keep an open mind. Contrary to most SH here I have no interest in Pyr one way or the other. Yet. Listening to the unreal transcript for last Q3 , I could not believe that a public co could behave that way. Until I realised why. PYR have no real institutional SH. Lets listen to the new financial guy for Q4. Hopefully we will get a transparent and realistic $$$ picture . Meanwhile regarding your comment, this was indeed the way several succesfull co behave ( 3M GE Westinghouse Alcoa etcetc. Not possible anymore. Even for the giant soft co forced to split and specialised and focus. Imagine then for the capital intensive one! Anyway, time will teach you this reality. Remenber this: try to graps all...Lose all. GLTA
MidtownGuy wrote: lol. Unrelated? Every one of those is built on their core plasma tech. Which is what smart companies do, innovate and expand around the core.
And they've sold more drosrite systems than any other, while waste incineration for the US Navy represents one of, if not the, largest contract yet, at $11.5MM.
But that must not be smart to you because... reasons.
raphaelle2 wrote:
... This could also maybe?? explain why Pyro seems desesparate to venture into all sorts of unrelated pseudo green ventures to become profitable? ( drossright, incineration, AM )?