RE:RE:RE:RE:GRAHAM B..
GrahamB wrote: paul03 wrote: What's there to talk about the regulatory actions? The professionals will handle it through the proper system. Unless you think we're all judges and lawyers, what anonymous unqualified people say about this matter would be very pointless on these boards and wouldn't add any value whatsoever. That's like asking a carpenter how to do an open heart surgery. Hmmm I'd use my skillsaw to open him up and my air nailer to staple him back up? Okkkkk thanks for your input mr carpenter, let's try the custodian over here see how he would do it instead...
It is one of the most important things you can do is an investor IMO. You need to be paying attention toward what regulators are saying and what the financial statements are saying.
Have you ever heard of the M score?
These types of analyses can help us predict companies at risk of failure and protect your investments. If you turn a blind eye to this and wait until the regulators decide, you would miss bankruptcies such as Enron
I guess there's different approaches, but being proactive, paying attention when regulatory authorities, are taking action against the CEO of the company you are invested in. I don't know, seems reasonable enough to be talking about it to me. Sweeping it under the rug put you at high risk if you are wrong.
Cant imagine why you wouldn't talk about it-unless you are hiding something.
Many red flags exist for this company IMO
I did pay attention to it, I read the release.
It's not sweeping it under the rug. It's called letting the proper individuals/teams handle it. I am not qualified to discuss such topics on a forum, I am mature enough to admit as such so will reserve my opinion on it until both sides are exposed and settled, which may take a year or two or more.
You can use your negative examples as you wish, I'll give a positive one. Musk and Tesla got fined 40M by SEC a few years back and they're doing fine. I'm sorry I know we were told never to use
Musk or Tesla as comparisons. My bad.