RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Completely misleading isHoldrrrr wrote: I mean even delissio has so much to say, dude doesn't even understand CIBC house trades aren't exclusive to Mellon trust sales. Utterly clueless.
Yet everyday he posts the same nonsense. Or how about him spamming multiple boards with the amf date acting like it was the OJ Simpson trial, when he knows full well the outcome could be several years away, with a maximum fine to pyr of 450k. Gimme a break.
The idea of minimizing the AMF allegations of fraud, based on the fines to the company is suspect, at the least.
Do you really believe if the CEO is banned from being a director for 5 years, and is a major shareholder will have minimal impact?
Hey read the Milstead G& M article . As he says:
"And the news release also assures shareholders that of the $14.5-million in penalties and allegedly ill-gotten proceeds the AMF is seeking in the matter, the regulator wants only $550,000 from the company if the case succeeds. Nearly all the rest would come from P. Peter Pascali, PyroGenesis’s CEO.
Oh. Okay, then. Perhaps we should recount some of the company’s history, and the AMF’s allegations, to see whether stockholders should be more riled up than reassured."
Read the whole article-its an eye opener.
Couple that with the dwindling cash, and possible insolvency
Newbies to this stock- Caveat Emptor!
FWIEW-IMO- do your own DD
I did and stayed clear after this was promoted by a pumper Scienec First who has now hidden, afetr losing any shred of credibility, after the Globe article and AMF allegations
Ask yourself this question:
Who has been right thus far?
The pumpers or the realists who are fact based?
Its an easy answer-if you bought on hype-you lost money
If you looked at the facts-you still have a -positive bank balance
Facts matter