RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Food for thoughtHARJAY wrote: Trying to be cutesy using my phrase about top acknowledging his lie and being a man and providing the apology i'm owed.
Your attempt falls flat and is so lame its pathetic , sad really
Harjay, what is clear to anyone that has followed this discussion between us is that you have been evasive, and now are denying the insult that started this by projecting your error onto me. In doing so, you are using two well recognized logical fallacies: the Tu Quoque (attempting to answer a criticism with a criticism, but not addressing your original post which was factually incorrect) and another ad hominem attack. I understand that perhaps there is something in your personality that prevents you from recognizing and acknowledging errors. Your original post in which you hastily made a conclusion about how insider postings were all the same, was also an error (so called slothful induction) .One lesson that may be useful to investors is that these same logical fallacies can exist in speculation, except there the sting of capital loss is added to that of perceived personal embarrrassment. (Although to me -admittting error is part of life-to others it affects the narrative they have constructed) Cheers everyone-I think an have made my point here.