Pyrogenesis Canada Inc T.PYR

Holderrrrrrrrrrr

[WolfOakville]

Do the additional r's in your handle relate to how long your willing to baghold here?

You've posted about nothing else for at least a couple of years. How much in the red are you to post so often. No other holdings? Hobbies?

[Holdrrrr]

Says the big bad "Wolf" whos credentials are "I once bought a mutual fund". Now I write rookie reviews biased to what side of the trade I'm on, mainly targeting low volume small cap stocks where sentiment can be easily influenced. All from my mom's basement.

[WolfOakville]

Dude, I've taken dumps with greater investing insight than you. My "rookie" reviews had me retire in my mid 40's and it seems to help others. I don't short anything I review. The only people who seem to take issue are bagholders when I tell them their baby is ugly. Well, your baby is grotesque. Sorry, not sorry. What's your average here, $3? Higher?  What's

[jazzykazz]

This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy

[WolfOakville]

I'm more of an edibles kind of guy. 

[tamaracktop]

Me too. Gummies easier on the lungs.

[tamaracktop]

I don't mainline anymore, but I'll never ever turn down an H-bomb if one's going around at the PyroGenesis success party.

[Holdrrrr]

Wow, calling yourself "Wolfie" really does make you super smart!  Or not.  Dudes telling other people what their average costs are LOL. Actually I have pointed out SEVERAL times my average is under 80 cents, because I was buying when the rest of the "know-it-all" crew was telling me to sell at 40 cents. But thanks for coming out.

[Holdrrrr]

I'm sure your in-depth reviews of pyrogenesis covers future revenue growth potential, if and when there's widespread industry adoption of ANY or ALL of its high tech processes currently under testing by giants like Constellium or Evonik. Right? Or did you leave that part out? Simply ealuating a high tech growth company that's trying to reinvent legacy processes, by its quarterly

[WolfOakville]

You heard it guys, his last response to me. Pyro couldn't run a McDonald's. They'd forget to collect money at the drive thru.

[Holdrrrr]

I take that response as I'm correct.  Without even reading your nonsense reviews, I knew the topic of future revenues and growth potentials wouldn't be mentioned. Here's a hint for your next review of a hight tech growth company trying to disrupt legacy processes. Include actual growth outlooks and prospects.  And what the company will be worth if it succeeds. Remember

[WolfOakville]

Look at you. Did you last 20 minutes? "This is my last reply" LOL you're a hack man. Poor management trumps tech every day of the week.  My next two reviews will show you what good companies actually look like. Stay tuned.

[Holdrrrr]

So now your just pointing out stupid things?  Like it's some gotcha moment?  Grow up man.  You are the one writing these biased reviews parading them around like they are gospel.  Not me, The way I see it, you are either ignorant to how a high growth company starting to break into the industry should be valuated, OR you are trying to trick people by leaving out revenue and

[WolfOakville]

Dude, for every $hitty stock I've given a poor review on, there's two or three hacks like you who spew the same BS.  They likely won't even match off revenues from 2020 this year. 95% of the revenue they make, the bills on payment are late or non existent, Their margins are grotesque compared to what they used to be on half the revenue of a few years ago. Insiders have enriched

[Holdrrrr]

Thank you for confirming. So you are simply ignorant to the difference in a high tech company, emerging and still in R&D phase, compared to a McDonalds, where month to month revenue is critical because growth is very limited. I think we are done here.  Great job on the huge ego and bragging about a few winning trades *slow clap* better than the king of xebec can claim anyway.

[sumpineh]

To the wolf I wouldn't waste your time.Most of the pumpers here are deaf,dumb and blind and refuse to look at numbers.Two of the biggest pumpers for years,( Developbc and ScienceFirst) finally saw the light and have not been heard from for almost a year now. The CEO has them mesmerized to the point where he walks on water and that his promises of large contracts are the gospel truth. You can

[Holdrrrr]

Sump pump has chimed in. Wolfie IS literally teaching stupid LOL Viewing high tech R&D companies still in testing as monthly cash generators like McDonald's. Glad you agree lmfao

[WolfOakville]

Fundamentals are fundamentals and bad mgmt is bad mgmt.  Mgmt > tech

[Holdrrrr]

Say whatever you want about management.  But that's opinion. Under Peter's watch this company has grown from nothing to $150 million dollars.  Revolutionized the fumed silica process, has solutions for MANY dirty legacy processes of industry,  Is currently in house testing at Constellium, and elsewhere, as an example.  Created a breakthrough way for producing 3D metal

[haratekid]

developbc and ScienceFirst left after Pyrogenesis' contract woth Agoracom ended. Isn't it strange?

[GrahamB]

And the fraud allegations published in the globe and mail. Went from "top" poster in stockhouse-basically have enough aliases they can spend the day voting for themselves to pump a stock, and promote themselves imo UNTIL reality hits. Them form a new alias -rinse, repeat.....

[filoux004]

Funny thing, I bet very few individuals that participate daily on this board actually own any shares. Glta and DD

[haratekid]

"Here's a hint for your next review of a hight tech growth company trying to disrupt legacy processes." Everyone knows you don't know anything about it. This is very likely your first investment. Second being HPQ. Please don't act like you can gove anyone tips about the field. You're a very young person who is upset because magical stonk doesn't go up and assume it