it has been said many times here the reason volume is low isthere is no interest in the stock In fact that claim is backwards. What's really taking place here is there's no interest in selling. There's an awful lot of long positions in the stock just like Westcoastlogger and most likely every regular worthy poster that takes the time to comment. To convince us that it's time to sell the narrative and optics have to be created that the sky is falling and people are running for the exit. That illusion can be fact-checked against trading volume. What we see with the low volume knockdowns is actually the exact opposite of what is really happening. When you know a given institution's holdings and suddenly there is a cross of + 100,000 shares it begs the question when did their proxies buy those shares considering that all along the respective time frame volume was so incredibly low. Real interesting question though is how many shares did they have to sell into the bid drive share price down acquire those hundred thousand shares? My guess would be 25,000