Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Resverlogix Corp T.RVX

Alternate Symbol(s):  RVXCF

Resverlogix Corp. is a Canada-based late-stage biotechnology company. The Company is engaged in epigenetics, with a focus on developing therapies for the benefit of patients with chronic diseases. Its epigenetic therapies are designed to regulate the expression of disease-causing genes. The Company's clinical program is focused on evaluating its lead candidate apabetalone (RVX-208) for the treatment of cardiovascular disease and associated comorbidities, and post-COVID-19 conditions. RVX-208 is a small molecule that is a selective bromodomain and extra-terminal (BET) inhibitor. BET bromodomain inhibition is an epigenetic mechanism that can regulate disease-causing genes. RVX-208 is a BET inhibitor selective for the second bromodomain (BD2) within the BET proteins. It partners with EVERSANA, to support the commercialization of RVX-208 for cardiovascular disease, post-COVID-19 conditions, and pulmonary arterial hypertension in Canada and the United States.


TSX:RVX - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by UTfineon Jun 07, 2013 4:55pm
149 Views
Post# 21499318

RE: RE: Esperion

RE: RE: Esperion

ETC-1002 inhibits sterol and fatty acid synthesis among other things. It seems Esperion is taking the angle of showing reductions in LDL-C, whereas RVX208 aims to increase ApoAI, which the more recent literature would suggest, is a better indicator of CV risk. So if both drugs were equally effective at their respective endpoints, i'd go with the latter.

IMHO

Disclaimer:Not investment advice

Here's a little pubmed snippit, although there is more out there. 

 2011 Jun;21(6):406-11. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2009.11.002. Epub 2010 Feb 19.

ApoB/apoA-I ratio is better than LDL-C in detecting cardiovascular risk.

Source

Internal Medicine, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche, Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale "Amedeo Avogadro" and Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria "Maggiore della Carità", Corso Mazzini 18, 28100 Novara, Italy.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS:

Cardiovascular (CV) events occur even when LDL-C are <100mg/dL. To improve the detection of CV risk we investigated the apoB/apoA-I ratio versus LDL-C in subjects considered normal glucose tolerant (NGT) by oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT).

METHODS AND RESULTS:

We enrolled 616 NGT (273 men and 343 women), and we measured insulin resistance, lipid profile, apoB/apoA-I and the factors compounding the metabolic syndrome (MetS). An unfavourable apoB/apoA-I (≥0.9 for males and ≥0.8 for females) was present in 13.9% of 108 patients with LDL-C <100mg/dL: compared to subjects with lower apoB/apoA-I (<0.9 for males and <0.8 for females), they had more elements of MetS and their lipid profile strongly correlated with high CV risk. Out of 314 patients with lower apoB/apoA-I, 40.12% had LDL-C ≥130mg/dL: these retained a more favourable lipid profile than corresponding subjects with elevated apoB/apoA-I ratio. Finally, we found a significant correlation between LDL-C and apoB/apoA-I ratio (r=0.48, p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS:

In NGT with LDL-C <100mg/dL, a higher apoB/apoA-I exhibited an atherogenic lipid profile, indicating that LDL-C alone is insufficient to define CV risk. Independent from LDL-level, when apoB/apoA-I is lower, the lipid profile is, in fact, less atherogenic. This study demonstrates that apoB/apoA-I is at least complementary to LDL-C in identifying the "effective" CV risk profile of asymptomatic NGT subjects.

 

Bullboard Posts