BETonMACE trial qualityI was just reading a couple of BDAZ's posts on Agora regarding the countries where the BETonMACE trial is happening.
I have little doubt that high quality science takes place throughout the world. However, as I looked at the countries involved it sort of raises the question of quality control of the trial. I recall reading posts about issues on the ASSURE trial. I also recall reading about the quality and expertise of the BETonMACE steering committee and felt reassured.
Does anyone have any POVs regarding quality control of the BETonMACE trial?
Also, I noted the paucity of comments after the AGMs/updates and just now read posts and, although I never want to speak for others, I do feel there has been a very large collective let down caused by Don's failure to deliver on the licensing deal (and I guess subsequently his very poor, non informative RVX update).
Great science continues at RVX and Zenith IMHO. Very poor performance on the business side in 2016. I'll continue to hope for 2017 or at least 2018.
Thanks
Toinv