Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Sherritt International Corp T.S

Alternate Symbol(s):  SHERF

Sherritt International Corporation is a Canada-based company engaged in the mining and refining of nickel and cobalt metals essential for the adoption of electric vehicles. The Company is engaged in the production of high purity nickel and cobalt metals from lateritic ore. Its technologies group creates solutions for oil and mining companies around the world to improve environmental performance... see more

TSX:S - Post Discussion

Sherritt International Corp > Td Upgrade Nov 9 $1.10 - sig increase NAV from power bus
View:
Post by rkhosla on Nov 10, 2022 12:16pm

Td Upgrade Nov 9 $1.10 - sig increase NAV from power bus

Sherritt International Corp.
(S-T) C$0.45

Extending Asset Lives Beyond 2040

Event

We have updated our model to reflect Q3/22 results and included a production expansion at the Moa nickel operations.

Impact: NEUTRAL

Management expects to demonstrate a Life of Mine plan for Moa, which will extend beyond 2040. We are currently modelling a mine life out to 2044. Sherritt expects to release an updated NI 43-101 technical report for Moa by the end of Q1/23.
 
Sherritt is moving forward with the next phase of its Moa JV expansion plan at a capital cost of US$50 million (100% basis). The scope of the expansion plan has been narrowed to the most critical components. Sherritt sees an opportunity to focus its strategy on increasing production of intermediary products that will enable it to fully utilize existing capacity at the refinery and also consider direct sales of intermediate product into the EV battery supply chain. An expansion of the Ft. Saskatchewan refinery has been put on hold.
 
Including the previously approved Slurry Preparation Plant (SPP), total capex for the expansion will be ~US$77 million (100% basis). The SPP will be completed in early 2024 and the second phase completed in late 2024. The full expansion plan will increase mixed sulphide production (MSP) by ~20%, or ~6,500 tonnes of contained metal. Adjusting for the expansion and inflationary adjustments to operating costs, our NPV-8% estimate for Moa has decreased slightly to $1,080mm (or $2.72/share) from $1,117mm ($2.81/share).

20-year extension for Sherritt's small but reliable power business. Cuba's Executive Council of Ministers approved a 20-year extension of Energas' power generation contract to March 2043. As a reminder, the previous contract was set to expire in 2023, at which time the power-generation assets would have reverted back to the Cuban government. In our view, the power business is not very large in scale (average three-year revenue of ~$37mm), but in the past, it provided Sherritt with a stable cash-flow base for its larger but more cyclical metals business. Our NAV-8% for the power business has increased to C$181mm (or $0.46/share) from C$25mm (or $0.06/share).

TD Investment Conclusion
 
We are maintaining our SPECULATIVE BUY recommendation. Our target price has increased to $1.10 (from $1.00).

Details
Sherritt reported Q3/22 adjusted EPS of $0.03. Q3/22 Adjusted EBITDA was $37.4 million.
 
Sherritt’s share of finished nickel and cobalt production at the Moa JV were 4,443t and 419t, respectively (TD: 4,125t and 431t, respectively). Reported cash cost for the quarter was US$6.76/lb of nickel (TD: US$3.70/lb).
 
Higher cash operating costs were affected by lower cobalt sales (relative to production) — management indicated that cobalt sales were negatively affected by a contraction in the consumer electronics sector compared with 2021 contributing to reduced lithium cobalt oxide demand. Higher input costs also affected operating costs. Nickel cash operating cost guidance for 2022 has been increased to US$4.50–US$5.00/lb (from US$4.00–US$4.50/lb previously).
 
Sherritt has reduced its 2022 growth capex guidance for the Moa JV to $10 million from $19 million due to the deferral of the spending on the next phase of the Moa expansion into 2023.
On October 13, Sherritt announced a comprehensive repayment agreement with its Cuban partners that should see $361.9 million owed to Sherritt by two Cuban entities repaid over a five-year period starting in 2023. The agreement addresses a long-standing source of frustration for Sherritt investors, given the lack of progress that has been made on repaying the overdue funds over many years. The five-year repayment time frame lines up well with maturities on Sherritt’s existing debt facilities, including its $317 million 8.5% notes due in 2026 and the $69 million 10.75% PIK notes due in 2029.

Under the terms of the agreements (the cobalt swap), General Nickel Company (GNC), Sherritt’s Moa JV partner, has agreed to assume certain liabilities of amounts owed to Sherritt by Union Cubapetroleo (CUPET) and Energas S.A. (Energas) in order to fully repay outstanding amounts over a five-year period. The outstanding receivable amounts owed to Sherritt from Energas and CUPET total ~$361.9 million.

Under the cobalt swap, over the five years beginning January 1, 2023, the Moa JV expects to distribute a maximum of 2,082 tonnes, or approximately 60% of current production (100% basis) of finished cobalt annually to the JV partners. GNC will redirect its 50% share of the total Moa JV dividends, up to 1,041 tonnes of finished cobalt per year, to Sherritt as repayment towards the outstanding receivables, provided that the total cobalt volume redirected has a value of at least US$57 million (~US$25.00/lb of cobalt).

Outlook
 
We have updated our model for Q3/22 results and revised our estimates for Moa and the Power business to reflect the expansion project and the operating contract extension. Our NAV-8% has increased to $2.02/share (from $1.87/share previously).

Valuation
Sherritt is currently trading at a P/NAV multiple of ~0.22x, compared with its small-cap producer group average of ~0.57x.

Justification of Target Price
Our target price is based on a 0.55x NAV-8% multiple to our net asset value estimate.  Our target multiple reflects higher political risks associated with the preponderance of Sherritt’s assets being located in Cuba.

Key Risks to Target Price
The main risks facing the company include forecast, financial, technical, and political
risks. Among other things, risks include those related to nickel and cobalt prices;
production volumes; input costs; the governing fiscal and legislative regimes; the timing
of key developments; market conditions; capital and operating costs; foreign exchange
rates; resources and reserves; operating parameters; permitting; environment; and
staffing and key personnel retention. Sherritt’s operations and assets could be affected
by COVID-19 travel, social-distancing, and other restrictions.
Comment by VerificateASAP on Nov 10, 2022 1:00pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by DaddyWarBucks on Nov 10, 2022 1:06pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by Maxmoe on Nov 10, 2022 1:25pm
Pretty gutsy report considering the amount of assets TD has in the USA. I remember the dark, bad old days, when Ian Delaney, his entire family, his executive team, were all on the black list for entry into Florida. And he and his lovely wife Kiki owned a condo in Florida at the time. If you were stupid enough to tell the nazi at the border you worked for Sherritt, owned shares in sherritt, or ...more  
Comment by Ernieandbert on Nov 10, 2022 2:10pm
And Barnes doesn't even look at Moa's WC!  He has S's in there at $159mm but if you add in Moa's, he would need to add $298mm.  That is worth $0.75/sh.  Add that to his NAV 10% (to be conservative) and you get $2.62/sh.  Shoddy analysis by the street.  I just don' t think they care as there is little to no IBK fees to be derived from this thing and no ...more  
Comment by rkhosla on Nov 10, 2022 2:36pm
Well I guess if the intention is to "hi" the money then management is doing an extremely good job ;-)  Neither analyst nor the average investor knows it's there... shhh.... let's keep the secret until after the ludicrous share linked incentives expire April 1st.      
Comment by rkhosla on Nov 10, 2022 2:37pm
'hide'
Comment by Ernieandbert on Nov 10, 2022 3:06pm
ridiculously priced units are struck at Board Meeting late Jan/early Feb...not Apr 1st.  But yes, be nice to keep it at $0.50, which is history on this thing is any indication, then it will not be a problem!  
Comment by rkhosla on Nov 10, 2022 3:29pm
Do you have an exact date? What five days will the average weighted price be taken from? I think it is really important we know this. I don't have time to look now but I think I had thought it was February 1.  But I don't know when those five critical days fall. This thing is totally ripe for manipulation and frankly if I had tens and tens of millions of dollars on the line I would be ...more  
Comment by Ernieandbert on Nov 10, 2022 3:34pm
1) Talk to co and ask them but I was told the Board meets late Jan/early Feb (no fixed date) to peg the price 2) You are most of the way there but in no way would an issuer manipulate the stock in the open market for options/units.  Rather they would (as I have been writing the past while on) and are manipulating the b/s by hoarding WC at Moa.  This also helps new mgmt get units cheaper. ...more  
Comment by Buyreallow on Nov 10, 2022 3:48pm
For the most part, management share participation is through grants of options, RSU's, PSU,'s.  Little ownership of common shares that they actually purchased with their own money.
Comment by rkhosla on Nov 10, 2022 3:51pm
But I guess these are subtly different issues. First trying to depress the SP so you can issue yourself cheapies that later will become lucrative.  But seconds, trying to depress so that your predecessors do not bankrupt the present company. In terms of the latter, I would imagine there is a pre-specified date for the five days weighted average share price to set the payout.  
Comment by Maxmoe on Nov 10, 2022 4:36pm
I don't know which crazy accusation is crazier. If you wouldn't say it to their face It's a hint it might be just kooky. Not KiKi. Not cool. If you believe these accusations, put it in writing, mail it to them. Don't forget to include your name. CC the OSC.  You may qualify for a whistleblower award. inquiries@osc.gov.on.ca   20 Queen Street West 20th Floor Toronto ...more  
Comment by FCPlady on Nov 10, 2022 8:14pm
You keep blaming the analyts for not properly valuating S. The onus has to be on the company to better explain its accounting and what should go in to calcuate its NAV.    If Barnes actually produced shoddy work, he would have been fired a long time ago and replaced by someone younger and cheaper.   The guy's been with TD for a long, long time.   I've heard ...more  
Comment by Ernieandbert on Nov 11, 2022 9:15am
I know him professionally and personally and talk to him on this file from time to time.  He is a great guy adn a good analyst.  My point is that he doesn't care about S in his coverage universe.  It is a very distant #15 out the 15 he covers is all.  No analyst is putting resources to this file given there is very little investment banking fees to be derived from it, and ...more  
Comment by rkhosla on Nov 11, 2022 9:56am
Paradigm Capital does have quite a strong relationship with Sherritt - one of our directors was I believe a founder of theirs and we always hire them as consultants.  In return they attend the conference calls and start ebery question with 'congratulations on another great quarter'.  These guys always seem to have a bias - i personally prefer if they are negative vs overely cosy. ...more  
Comment by VerificateASAP on Nov 11, 2022 10:04am
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by rkhosla on Nov 11, 2022 11:00am
You are wrong:  https://www.sherritt.com/English/Investor-Relations/Analyst-Coverage/default.aspx
Comment by VerificateASAP on Nov 11, 2022 11:10am
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by rkhosla on Nov 11, 2022 11:30am
Honestly? His attendance rate higher than all others and you think he doesnt write reports?  Bug off man.  Such a buffoon you are.  
Comment by VerificateASAP on Nov 11, 2022 12:13pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by FCPlady on Nov 11, 2022 12:44pm
On this we agree.    IMO, it's only a matter of time before TD and Scotia drop coverage on S.  The Cuba risk, lack of revenue from financings, low instiutional trading etc don't provide any real incenvtives.   It's probably why neither were on the last 2 conference calls.  National makes enough money on S to keep their analyst on the file.  
Comment by VerificateASAP on Nov 11, 2022 4:08pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by VerificateASAP on Nov 21, 2022 10:41pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities