Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Sherritt International Corp T.S

Alternate Symbol(s):  SHERF

Sherritt International Corporation is a Canada-based company engaged in the mining and refining of nickel and cobalt metals essential for the adoption of electric vehicles. The Company is engaged in the production of high purity nickel and cobalt metals from lateritic ore. Its technologies group creates solutions for oil and mining companies around the world to improve environmental performance... see more

TSX:S - Post Discussion

Sherritt International Corp > Fort (non) expansion.
View:
Post by FrozenInOntario on Jan 17, 2023 11:44am

Fort (non) expansion.

One point that did not get a lot of attention from this forum : Sherritt will not to invest in the Fort smelter to refine the totality Moa increased production.    Instead, any excess concentrate will be sold on the market.
When you think about it, sending concentrate from Moa to Halifax and railed to Alberta is quite costly.   Of course, if they could ship it to Thunder Bay, it would decrease the costs materially but then, they can’t while there are US sanctions.  Anyway, if they had to build this smelter today, pretty sure they would not locate it in Alberta but probably on the East Coast.
All this to say that by not investing on the smelter, it shows that Binedell has pretty good common sense by not increasing additional capital spending for no risk adjusted return. 
What will be his next move ?   
 
GLTA
Comment by Albatross on Jan 17, 2023 11:56am
Well transport cost is just 1 of the costs... what about cost of natural gas (ways cheaper in Alberta) what about access to cheap sulfur (main component of the refining). There's mounds of it in Alberta from the upgrading and refining of heavy oil.  what about selling fertilizer to local markets? Alberta and Sask are huge markets for fertilizer.  you can't just look at ...more  
Comment by VerificateASAP on Jan 17, 2023 11:58am
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by rkhosla on Jan 17, 2023 12:27pm
ding ding ding ding!  correct on all counts
Comment by NorthVan77 on Jan 17, 2023 7:47pm
Pathe always spoke of the transport costs to Fort Saskatchewan as being fairly insignificant.  In addition to key inputs being available in Alberta much of their product ships to Asia so it need to pass Alberta one way or another.  The main reason the plant was built there in the first place was because of widely available NG and sulpher.
Comment by rkhosla on Jan 17, 2023 12:26pm
Right - all that cheap halifax natural gas? The smelter belongs in Louisiana where it was in the beginning... but that's another story...  Just across the pond from Cuba
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities
USER FEEDBACK SURVEY ×

Be the voice that helps shape the content on site!

At Stockhouse, we’re committed to delivering content that matters to you. Your insights are key in shaping our strategy. Take a few minutes to share your feedback and help influence what you see on our site!

The Market Online in partnership with Stockhouse